answersLogoWhite
Politics and Government

What is an concurring opinion?


Top Answer
User Avatar
Wiki User
Answered 2014-06-20 20:59:37

A concurring opinion is a decision by one or more judges. It means they have agreed with more than 1 person what your sentence and punishment should be.

001
๐Ÿ™
0
๐Ÿคจ
0
๐Ÿ˜ฎ
0
๐Ÿ˜‚
0
User Avatar

Your Answer

Loading...

Still Have Questions?

Related Questions

What is known as the concurring opinion?

Concurring means agreeing. So an concurring opinion is one when two people agree.


How does a dissenting opinion differ from a concurring opinion?

Dissenting means you disagree concurring means you do agree


What is the concurring opinion in Loving v. Virginia?

There is no concurring opinion in Loving v. Virginia. The court opinion was unanimous.


What is the major difference between a majority opinion and a concurring opinion issued by the supreme court?

What is a major difference between a majority opinion and a concurring opinion issued by the Supreme Court?


What is a concurring opinion?

In US Supreme Court decisions, a concurring opinion is an opinion by one or more justices which agrees with the result the majority opinion reached but either for additional or other legal reasons which the majority opinion rests on. The writer of a concurring opinion is counted within the majority of justices who agreed on the ultimate result of the case, but disagrees in some way with the legal reasoning of the other justices. The concurring opinion sets forth that justice's own reasoning. In law, a concurring opinion is a written opinion by some of the judges of a court which agrees with the majority of the court but might arrive there in a different manner. In a concurring opinion, the author agrees with the decision of the court but normally states reasons different from those in the court opinion as the basis for his or her decision. When no absolute majority of the court can agree on the basis for deciding the case, the decision of the court may be contained in a number of concurring opinions, and the concurring opinion joined by the greatest number of jurists is referred to as the plurality opinion.In law, a concurring opinion is a written opinion by some of the judges of a court which agrees with the majority of the court but might arrive there in a different manner. In a concurring opinion, the author agrees with the decision of the court but normally states reasons different from those in the court opinion as the basis for his or her decision. When no absolute majority of the court can agree on the basis for deciding the case, the decision of the court may be contained in a number of concurring opinions, and the concurring opinion joined by the greatest number of jurists is referred to as the plurality opinion.


What type of opinion is written when a US Supreme Court justice agrees with the majority but for different reasons?

The justice may write a concurring opinion, or an opinion "concurring in judgment only."


Who were the concurring and dissenting justices for Morse v Frederick?

You can take a look at the opinions at the link below.Justice Thomas wrote a concurring opinionJustice Alito wrote a concurring opinion in which Justice Kennedy joinedJustice Stevens wrote a dissenting opinion in which Justices Souter and Ginsberg joinedJustice Breyer wrote an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part


What is an opinion written by a Supreme Court justice who agrees with the majority opinion?

A concurring opinion


What kind of US Supreme Court decision indicates more members of the majority signed a concurring opinion than the official opinion of the Court?

If more justices agree with a concurring opinion than with the opinion of the Court, the decision is called a plurality.


What are dissenting opinions and concurring opinion?

The basis for a good debate.


What does a justice write if he agrees with the opinion of the Court but not its reasoning?

The opinion is typically labeled "Concurring in Judgment."


How is the concurrent opinion different from the majority opinion?

A concurring opinion is one that has reached the same conclusion as the majority opinion, but for different reasons from the majority.


What was the concurring opinion in the Engel v Vitale case?

dragon ballz


What is the purpose of a concurring opinion?

To provide a slightly different legal argument for the same opinion of the majority decision


Why would a Supreme Court justice write a concurring opinion?

A Supreme Court justice may choose to write a concurring opinion when he or she agrees with the majority decision, but wants to add perceptions or legal reasoning not addressed, or not addressed to that justice's satisfaction, in the majority opinion (opinion of the Court).


What does a US Supreme Court justice write when agreeing with the majority?

A concurring opinion


What is the differences between a dissenting and a concurring opinion?

Concurring is that of agreeing; dissenting is that of disagreeing. And I learnt this in 30 seconds off Google, using 'define:...' -- google it first. -.-


Who wrote concurring opinion in US v Nixon?

US v. Nixon, 418 US 683 (1974)There was no concurring opinion in US v. Nixon. The eight voting justices (Rehnquist recused himself) were unanimous and all signed Chief Justice Warren Burger's opinion of the Court.


Why do Supreme Court justices write concurring and dissenting opinions in a case?

The justice disagrees with the majority opinion.


What is the name given to a written decision by Supreme Court Justices that while they agree with the final outcome of the case they do not agree with the reasoning behind the final outcome?

It is a concurring opinion. If there is no disagreement with the basis, the justice is included in the "majority opinion." In some cases, concurring opinions can become plurality decisions.


When the US Supreme Court rules how many opinions can it issue about this one ruling?

There is no mandated limit; however, the practical limit would be nine -- one for each member of the Court. Only one opinion may be submitted as the official opinion of the Court; however, each justice is free to write a dissenting or concurring (or dissenting in part and concurring in part) opinion as part of the legal record. While concurring and dissenting opinions are unenforceable, they may be cited as precedent in future cases and sometimes become more influential than the original opinion of the Court.


One or more justices who agree with the majority's conclusion about a case but do so for different reasons write a?

concurring opinion


What is the difference between a majority opinion a dissenting opinion and a concurring opinion?

Majority opinion - Also called the "Opinion of the Court," this is the official verdict in the case that represents the vote of the majority of justicesDissenting opinion - An opinion written by a justice who disagrees with the majorityConcurring opinion - An opinion that agrees with the decision but may disagree with the some of the reasoning behind the Court opinion, or may elaborate on a point made or introduce further relevant informationThe most important type is the majority opinion. The majority opinion is, as the name suggests, the opinion of the majority of judges hearing the case. In most cases, a majority opinion requires five Justices, unless one or more Justices have recused themselves from a given decision. The majority opinion is important because it defines the precedent that all future courts hearing a similar case should follow.Majority opinions are sometimes accompanied by concurring opinions. Concurring opinions are written by individual Justices in the majority. These opinions agree with the majority opinion, but may stress a different point of law. Sometimes, concurring opinions will agree with the result reached by the majority, but for a different reason altogether.Opinions written by justices not in the majority are known as dissenting opinions. Dissenting opinions are important because they provide insight into how the Court reached its decision.the statement written to explain why the decision was made (GradPoint)For more information, see Related Questions, below.


What is the difference majority opinion, a dissenting opinion and conccrring opinion?

A concurring opinion is written by a justice who agrees with the outcome reached by the majority, but who came to that conclusion in a different way and wants to write about why. A dissenting opinion is written by a justice who disagreed with the majority and wants his disagreement known and explained


How do you use concurring in a sentence?

A sentence with the word concurringI was doing my homework concurring to my brother playing outside