A passage or quotation at the beginning of a text that helps set a theme
The form it takes--literary, as in a book or letter, epigraphic, as in an inscription, or archeological. Or, it may have to do with reliability e.g. if the source is biased or not, contemporary or not etc.
Vedrana Delonga has written: 'The Latin epigraphic monuments of early mediaeval Croatia' -- subject(s): Antiquities, Roman, Christian antiquities, Inscriptions, Latin, Latin Inscriptions, Roman Antiquities, Romans
The earliest deciphered epigraphic inscriptions are found in Sri Lanka and South India from the 6th-4th century BC (Tamil Brahmi). Inscriptions in the Brahmi script appear in the northern Indian subcontinent, from at least the 3rd century BC (Ashoka inscriptions)
Rosanna Friggeri has written: 'The epigraphic collection of the Museo nazionale romano at the Baths of Diocletian' -- subject(s): Antiquities, Catalogs, Greek Inscriptions, Inscriptions, Greek, Inscriptions, Latin, Latin Inscriptions, Museo nazionale romano 'La collezione epigrafica del Museo nazionale romano alle Terme di Diocleziano' -- subject(s): Antiquities, Catalogs, Greek Inscriptions, Latin Inscriptions, Museo nazionale romano
Wolfgang Frank has written: 'Psychiatrie zum Gegenstandskatalog 3' 'Der Stier von Scapa Flow' -- subject(s): Naval operations, Submarine, World War, 1939-1945, U-47 (Submarine), Germany. Kriegsmarine, German Personal narratives, Officers, Germany, Submarine captains, Biography, German Naval operations, Naval History 'The Sea Wolves' -- subject(s): German Naval operations, Naval operations, Submarine, World War, 1939-1945 'Prien greift an' -- subject(s): Naval operations, Submarine, World War, 1939-1945
2 syllables: graphic, rafik, traffic 3 syllables: bus traffic, car traffic, drug traffic, foot traffic, slave traffic, truck traffic 4 syllables: calligraphic, compugraphic, demographic, epigraphic, ethnographic, holographic, hydrographic, lithographic, logographic, micrographic, orographic, photographic, pornographic, reprographic, stenographic, stratigraphic, summagraphic, topographic 5 syllables: bicycle traffic, choreographic, commuter traffic, oceanographic, stereographic, vehicle traffic 6 syllables: automobile traffic, pedestrian traffic, vehicular traffic
Jacobus Johannes Ewoud Hondius has written: 'Novae inscriptiones Atticae' -- subject(s): Greek Inscriptions, Inscriptions, Greek 'New Saxa Loquuntur a Bibliography of Epigraphic Publications on Greek Inscriptions'
The question " who invented telugu" is still not known for archeologists but some facts hidden in its discovery.The earliest epigraphic record of the Telugu language dates to the late 6th century CE. However, there have been proposals of traces of Telugu recorded before that date. Some Telugu words appear in the Maharashtri Prakrit anthology of poems (the Gatha Saptashati) collected by the 1st century BCE Satavahana King Hāla.[11]Inscriptions containing Telugu words claimed to "date back to 400 B.C." were discovered in Bhattiprolu in Guntur district. The English translation of one inscription reads: "Gift of the slab by venerable Midikilayakha"
You are way apart in category with this question. Greek had influenced several nations and the Jews were one of those. The Septuagint was the Koine Greek translation of the Hebrew Old Testament. This came around the 3rdB.C. after 4 centuries that Rome came into power as an empire. As I said, the major literary product of the contact of Judaism and Hellenistic culture is the Septuagint but there were some other writings like so-called apocrypha and pseud epigraphic apocalyptic literature like the Assumption of Moses, the Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs, the Book of Baruch, the Greek Apocalypse of Baruch. Most of those were fiction writings of those days. Important sources are Philo of Alexandria and Flavius Josephus. Some scholars consider Paul of Tarsus a Hellenist as well and they are right about that. You have to understand that this period is from the death of Alexander the Great to the death of Cleopatra and the incorporation of Egypt in the Roman Empire. There was a contrast between Jews who used Hebrew and Jews who used Greek in the synagogue service. That came with the Hellenistic movement.
In modern times, bigoted Brahmins have projected Bharatavarsha as the ancient Sanskrit name for the whole of modern Republic of India. This, however, has no historical foundation. Bharatavarsha did not include the whole of India and never did, but only denoted the kingdom of the Aryan invader Bharata, who was a chieftain of one of the Aryan tribes that invaded present-day India. This small region comprised only a small part of the upper Ganges valley. Epigraphic Evidence The epigraphic evidence confirms that Bharata originally did not mean the whole of India. but only a small part of North India. Kharavela who lived c.63 BC - c.23 BC ( C.R.Mishra, p.114 ), was one of the most famous kings of the Kolarian-Dravidian kingdom of Kalinga. His conquests ranged far and wide. They are celebrated in the Hathigumpha inscription. The nineth and tenth lines of this inscription clearly mention that he invaded Bharata from Kalingam thereby implying that Bharata at that time did not include the whole of India - Line 9-10 : "And, in the nineth year, (His Majesty) [ Kharavela ] caused to be built the great victory place - royal residence at the cost of thirty eight hundred thousand (coins). " Then, in the 10th year (His Majesty) who embodied the principles of politics, diplomacy and peace, caused (the army) to march towards Bharatavarsha for conquest ." -- ( C.R.Mishra, p.128 ) Prof. C.R.Mishra notes that Bharata did not originally denote India : " Bharatavarsha, here is used in a general sense denoting the regions of northern India " (C.R.Mishra, p.121). Elaborating this, he states that Bharata is mentioned for the first time in the Hatigumpha inscription and that it denoted only a part of North India - " In the epigraphic records of ancient India, the name `Bharatavarsha' is mentioned for the first time in the Hatigumpha inscription. But the name denoted North India at that time." -- ( C.R.Mishra, p.130, n.79 ) A.L. Basham states that Bharatas was one of the invading Aryan tribes which settled in the region between the Sutlej and Jamna, which later became known as Brahmavarta (Basham, The Wonder that was India, p.30). Thus, the first time that we have undisputed usage of the word Bharatavarsha, it denoted only North India. There is no evidence of Bharata's kingdom extending beyond Northern Republic of India. Historical Evidence Historical evidence refutes the Brahmanist claim that Bharata conquered the whole of India. Bharata's ancestors lived in the region of the Caspian sea in Central Asia; they were nomadic tribesmen of Aryan stock. Bharata's legendary capital lay in the Kabul valley, i.e. Yusufzai territory of modern Afghanistan: " According to local tradition, the original seat of the empire of Bharata was much further to the north-west, namely, at the site now occupied by the ruins of Takh-i-Bahi, in the country of the Yusufzais to the northward of Peshawar." -- ( Wheeler, p.48n.2 ) From this base he descended with his hordes of Aryan horsemen onto the plains of Gangetic India. There he defeated Indra ( Wheeler, p.45 ), a descendant of the first Aryan invader Indra, earning himself the title "most renowned of the Lunar race" ( Wheller, p.47 ). He then conquered the Upper Ganges valley, exceeding Indra's dominion. After the wars of annexation, the Raj of Bharata extended over the enitre doab between the rivers Ganges and the Jumna right up to the junction of these 2 rivers ( Wheeler, p.44 ). It is thus obvious that Bharata's empire, Bharatavarsha, only included a few provinces in the Ganges Valley. His son Hastin founded Hastinapur further down the Ganges valley, after this second wave of Aryans had pushed on from the neighbourhood of Peshawar up to the banks of the Ganges ( Wheeler, p.48.n2 ). It is thus evident that even the lower Ganges valley was beyond Bharata's control. Hence, the Brahminist concept of `One Ancient Bharata' under perpetual dominion of the Brahmin Aryans is a fallacy. In the words of Winston Churchill, `India is as much a nation as the equator' .
The earliest surviving texts in Proto-Arabic, or Ancient North Arabian, are the Hasaean inscriptions of eastern Saudi Arabia, from the 8th century BC, written not in the modern Arabic alphabet, nor in its Nabataean ancestor, but in variants of the epigraphic South Arabian musnad. These are followed by 6th-century BC Lihyanite texts from southeastern Saudi Arabia and the Thamudic texts found throughout Arabia and the Sinai, and not actually connected with Thamud. Later come the Safaitic inscriptions beginning in the 1st century BC, and the many Arabic personal names attested in Nabataean inscriptions (which are, however, written in Aramaic). From about the 2nd century BC, a few inscriptions from Qaryat al-Faw (near Sulayyil) reveal a dialect which is no longer considered "Proto-Arabic", but Pre-Classical Arabic. By the fourth century AD, the Arab kingdoms of the Lakhmids in southern Iraq, the Ghassanids in southern Syria the Kindite Kingdom emerged in Central Arabia. Their courts were responsible for some notable examples of pre-Islamic Arabic poetry, and for some of the few surviving pre-Islamic Arabic inscriptions in the Arabic alphabet.[12] and was also written on the Rosetta Stone.
The earliest surviving texts in Proto-Arabic, or Ancient North Arabian, are the Hasaean inscriptions of eastern Saudi Arabia, from the 8th century BC, written not in the modern Arabic alphabet, nor in its Nabataean ancestor, but in variants of the epigraphic South Arabian musnad. These are followed by 6th-century BC Lihyanite texts from southeastern Saudi Arabia and the Thamudic texts found throughout Arabia and the Sinai, and not actually connected with Thamud. Later come the Safaitic inscriptions beginning in the 1st century BC, and the many Arabic personal names attested in Nabataean inscriptions (which are, however, written in Aramaic). From about the 2nd century BC, a few inscriptions from Qaryat al-Faw (near Sulayyil) reveal a dialect which is no longer considered "Proto-Arabic", but Pre-Classical Arabic. By the fourth century AD, the Arab kingdoms of the Lakhmids in southern Iraq, the Ghassanids in southern Syria the Kindite Kingdom emerged in Central Arabia. Their courts were responsible for some notable examples of pre-Islamic Arabic poetry, and for some of the few surviving pre-Islamic Arabic inscriptions in the Arabic alphabet.[12] and was also written on the Rosetta Stone.