Want this question answered?
Definitely possible to photograph it. But you cannot catch the image on a screen but virtual image can be seen by eyes. So photograph too is possible.
A real image can be captured on a screen (eg white paper) whereas a virtual image cannot.To see an image on a screen light rays must come to a focus on the screen, but with a virtual image no actual light rays come together at the location of the image .. hence a virtual image cannot be seen on a screen.A real image is a source of light energy .. rays of light radiate from it.A virtual image is not a source of light energy.. rays of light do not radiate from it ( although it's where the brain 'thinks' the light originated.)
An image doesn't reflect light.An image that forms in a focal plane ... and could be seen if there'sa piece of tissue or a puff of smoke at that place ... is a "real" image.
Yes. That's a good quick way to determine whether or not a real image exists. You can also use a piece of thin tissue paper, kleenex, or toilet paper, and see the image from the other side. Put a piece of photosensitive material there at the real image, and you get a permanent photo.
one is more diminished than the other
It means that the image cannot be seen on the screen.
Definitely possible to photograph it. But you cannot catch the image on a screen but virtual image can be seen by eyes. So photograph too is possible.
Definitely possible to photograph it. But you cannot catch the image on a screen but virtual image can be seen by eyes. So photograph too is possible.
each eye is not primarily connected to one hemisphere only instead, each visual half field is projected to the opposite hemisphere so, if an image is seen in the right visual field it would be seen in the left hemisphere and if an image is seen in the left visual field it would be seen in the right hemisphere
you are contradicting yourself here. a virtual image is VIRTUAL. meaning it technically doesn't exist, (though you can manipulate the light to see it) its focus exists beyond the plane of view and therefore you can't see it. to better explain this, pictures do a whole lot more, search for concave and convex lenses and compare the refraction of an image that you get
Display resolution .
In a Tree (such as a process tree [as seen in this screen-shot ], or a file tree [as seen in this screen-shot ]) the "children" as you aptly described them are generally called "Descendants"
A real image can be captured on a screen (eg white paper) whereas a virtual image cannot.To see an image on a screen light rays must come to a focus on the screen, but with a virtual image no actual light rays come together at the location of the image .. hence a virtual image cannot be seen on a screen.A real image is a source of light energy .. rays of light radiate from it.A virtual image is not a source of light energy.. rays of light do not radiate from it ( although it's where the brain 'thinks' the light originated.)
each eye is not primarily connected to one hemisphere only instead, each visual half field is projected to the opposite hemisphere so, if an image is seen in the right visual field it would be seen in the left hemisphere and if an image is seen in the left visual field it would be seen in the right hemisphere
An image doesn't reflect light.An image that forms in a focal plane ... and could be seen if there'sa piece of tissue or a puff of smoke at that place ... is a "real" image.
As Jobs explained at the launch of the iPhone Apple built a special cable so the image from the iOS device can be seen on the big screen.
Yes. That's a good quick way to determine whether or not a real image exists. You can also use a piece of thin tissue paper, kleenex, or toilet paper, and see the image from the other side. Put a piece of photosensitive material there at the real image, and you get a permanent photo.