At the bottom of any food chain are the producers. Generally producers are thought of as being "green plants". A producer need not be green, (diatoms, red algae brown algae, chemosynthetic bacteria as in the ocean deeps by hot-water vents are examples of non-green producers). The foregoing are not even vascular plants. Perhaps the producer organisms responsible for the greatest food production would be the phytoplankton of the oceans.
If an organism is being sought as the occupier of the bottom of a food chain or web, I agree. However, at the bottom of any food chain or web I would place an energy source. The food pyramid sits upon one or several energy sources. It is not an organism, but I believe it must precede any organism capable of synthesizing a food. Perhaps the question now may be, "What was the first energy incorporating organism?"
The bottom of the food chain is the plant or the producer.
The consumer is always at the top, or end of the food chain. Producers are at the bottom, or beginning of the food chain.
the organisms in the bottom of the food chain are usually producers.
bottom
Plants are usually at the bottom of the food chain. The thing at the bottom of the food chain has to be able to make its own food, if it ate anything it would no longer be at the bottom of the food chain. Plants make their own food from carbon dioxide, water and sunlight in a process called photosynthesis. i agree and would just like to add the sun isn't the bottem of the food chain
kelp is foun at the bottom of the food chain haaa not
They are not at the top of the food chain they are very close to the bottom.
Well it all depends on what animals are in your food chain
Geckos are not at the top of the food chain. They are at the bottom.
Consumers are not at the bottom of the food chain. They are at the top as they consume producers and primary consumers. Consumers play a vital role in regulating ecosystems by controlling population sizes of other organisms.
plants
Plants