Want this question answered?
Most probably because the original theories are based on a certain amount of truth. Now a days, theories are not accepted until there is a significant amount of evidence to back it up. If there should be new evidence that states otherwise, then the theory will be modified. Of course, this is not a black and white situation. Not all theories have been "modified." Some have been completely discarded when solid facts have proved otherwise. For example, the Flat Earth Theory and the theory that the Earth is the centre of the universe.
Personally, I believe no one sees truth in its most perfect and purest form. We interpret what we see, we interpret what we hear, and we interpret what we read, and we call that truth (or reality). Really, its a perception sometimes based on fact and sometimes not. Perceptions can be correct and on target, and sometimes the farthest thing form the truth. It's just a perception. One thing I believe we can count on is that if there is anything unchanging and stead fast, it is change itself. Change is inevitable. It will always occur.
They try with all their might, if they are really scientists, to disprove them. As theories stand up under many challenges, and usually over the course of many years, it becomes more reasonable to consider that there is truth in the theory. But as we know, even long standing theories can be toppled when the right challenges are presented.
There are various reasons. Here are some:They might be skeptical of the reliability or truth of what other scientists have claimed.They might be trying to understand the earlier results better.They might be hoping to extend the other scientist's results.They might be trying to determine whether there are limits to the applicability of the other scientist's results.
A reason-based approach to the truth and justice
The noun 'principle' is an abstract noun; a word for a general or basic truth on which other truths or theories can be based; a word for a rule of conduct or behavior; a word for a concept.
The Truth Seeker blog is based in England. The site deals with conspiracy theories about JFK, government cover ups on UFOs and ancient mysteries like Atlantis.
LoveAnswer:The essential idea of truth in the Bible is faithfulness or reliability. God's truth (faithfulness or reliability) is basic for all other truth.
Perception is mostly viewed as subjective. Meaning it cannot be proven with facts, although it is based on reality, but that reality is proven to be a false reality. Truth however, is viewed as objective. Meaning it can be proven with facts, and is based on an unbiased stand point.
No. Science is ruthlessly tested and if theories fail they are discarded. Religion has no tests at all, and has no bearing on any scientific subject. Faith and truth are different things. You can believe what you want - science is about finding out truth.
Daoism is the study of basic truth and ideas about the universe
There have been conspiracy theories as long as there have been conspiracies, since the beginning of time.
The truth is LEARN
A basic truth is a fact or principle that is widely accepted as accurate or valid without needing further proof or explanation. It is a foundational belief that serves as a basis for understanding or reasoning.
😐
A basic truth is defined as "something that explains or controls how something happens or works". Synonyms for the concept of "basic truth" are principle, certainty, nature, actualization, precept.
The basic beliefs of Christianity are all based on the Holy Bible. Some branches have changed things or added to the Bible, but orthodox Christianity holds the Bible as the only basis and the only truth in Christianity.