Battlefield if you are more into graphics. Crysis if you are into storyline.
However, while technically Battlefield 3 should be outputting higher detailed graphics, we see this isn't consistently the case in various locations. The CryEngine3 engine allows not only for better physics representations, but also graphical. CryEngine3 also has better compatibility with native options within Nvidia and AMD graphic cards. Being the recent competitor, BF3 still has the edge when it comes to netcode, compatibility, and optimization tweaks. Aside from the technical standpoint, both have great storylines - albeit, the Crysis storyline has always gone that extra mile to include detail and background.
In my opinion Killzone 3 is better than Crysis 2 because crysis doesn't have that much of sense to the story and the gameplay isn't that good either. On the other hand, killzone 3 has a better gameplay, better graphics and an EXCELLENT POINT to the story.
Battlefield
I have to say that battlefield 3 is better
there are 3.. crysis crysis warhead crysis 2
Thats legendary amounts of ram its definitely enought to run any of todays newest games like crysis 3 and battlefield 3.
crysis 3 is a actually sequel to crysis 2 at the end of crysis 2 alcatraz gained prophet's memories so in crysis 3 its actually alcatraz's body but prophet's memories and together with alcatraz's memories
Yes most definitely. After Crysis 2 releases in March 2011. I am sure there will be Crysis 3 coming after that.
I would say battlefield 3 but there is a lot of different opinions on this.
yes more people play battlefield and i personally like battlefield better
No. Call of duty is better.
blops2
No