Clearly, the PSP slim and lite (PSP 3000 has been out for some time now) is better then the original PSP. I would only recommend the PSP-1000 if you have a tendency to drop your PSP a lot since it has a metal chassis which the slim and lite does not have.
they are the same but the slim and lite are slimand lite
THERE IS NO PSP LITE, ONLY PSP SLIM.
sony have 5 psp psp fat,(1000) psp slim, psp lite, psp slim and lite and psp 3000. the best is psp slim and lite . and the cost $ 299.in game stop best buy and save $ 2o dollar
The DS Lite has sold a lot more than the PSP overall, but it's a matter of what you want, the PSP has much better graphics and controls, but the DS has 2 screens, a touchscreen and is cheaper.
PSP lite and PSP normal? You mean the Fat and Slim versions? The slim version of the PSP is a smaller version with a few additional features. As far as I know theres no "lite" version of the PSP, they can all do the same things. And the slim is messed up >.> \
I'd say 3000 for features that it offers like skype, but you don't want to waste money on games so PSP slim and lite is better because it can be installed with a custom firmware. Note: Once you buy the PSP install the custom firmware immediately, search for: PSP CFW 5.00 m33
It can depend because sometimes there's no difference but that's if your talking about the 3000 slim & lite but if it's just the slim & lite then that's refering to the 2000 slim & lite and the 2000 is the older model and the 3000 is an improvement of the 2000
that is up to you.I have a ds lite too, and I would do anything for a psp slim, so I would say yes.
By slim, you mean PSP-2000. By lite, you mean PSP-3000. main differences- PSP 2000 is hackable.(Most are, some arent) you can install Custom Firmware to it. The psp 3000 is unhackable at the moment. The psp 3000 has many bugs with the screen, where it messes up.
no it is not but psp slim is easier to break and it has got a better software.
the psp
36. Bucks