I prefer Philips after owning two iPod mp3 players. Apple's batteries do not last long enough.
ipod nano
I would suggest Ipod Nano because mp3 player you can just listen to music and other and other stuff but on Ipod nano it has calender, games, you can record videos and listen to music and on some ipod nano you can download unlimited music.
Ipod nano
What is an Ipod Nano? The iPod Nano (trademarked, marketed, and stylized as iPod nano) is a portable media player designed and marketed by Apple. The first generation of the iPod Nano was introduced in the end of 2005 as a replacement for the iPod mini.
The iPod classic is better. It has a much more space than the Nano, and a larger screen. It's also not much more expensive than the Nano. The nano is easier to carry around and more lightweight, but can only hold a fraction of the songs a Classic can. The nano is good if all you want are songs and a few movies. The Classic, on the other hand, is bigger and bulkier, but can hold plenty of songs and movies. The right choice depends on what you use your ipod for. For video player, the ipod classic is better. For music player, the ipod nano 4G is amazing. As the nano chromatic is amazing music player, you can also put video to nano chromatic with the guide.
DEFINATELY WITHOUT QUESTION THE IPOD NANO IS WAY BETTER. Buy the nano , not piece of plastic iriver
6, you can store more songs.
A Ipod would be the best choice as it has alot more memory and it has more items in it. matters which mp4 player.... i know zume is pretty good (better than ipod...)
the itouch has more and better things then the ipod nano trust me i have both
Neither works better, but i like the iPod nano third generation. It is alot smaller, but still does video.
if u want something cheap then the third would be better.
The ipod touch is way better, u can do more things on it.