claim
claim
claim
It is both arguable and defensible.
It's arguable. A lot of schools claim its theirs.
Facts are unarguable and proven, claims are arguable but contain evidence as well.
An arguable claim about the poem
Improving bicycle lanes would reduce road accidents
An arguable claim possesses several key qualities: it is specific and clear, allowing for a focused discussion; it presents a debatable assertion, meaning reasonable people can disagree; it is supported by evidence or reasoning that can be scrutinized; and it addresses a relevant issue or topic that invites differing perspectives. These qualities ensure that the claim can stimulate critical thinking and meaningful dialogue.
It expresses a point of view. It is not arguable. It cannot be supported. It is a significant statement.
Oh, dude, let me break it down for you. The statement "There should be no minimum voting age" is definitely arguable, like, come on, people can argue about anything these days. But is it defensible? Well, that's a whole other story. So, the answer is D) It is arguable but not defensible. Like, you can argue it all day long, but defending it might be a bit tricky.
A claim must be positioned as arguable to facilitate debate and discussion, allowing for multiple perspectives and the potential for opposing viewpoints. This engagement encourages critical thinking and examination of evidence, which is essential for persuasive argumentation. Without a clear stance, a claim risks becoming a statement of fact rather than a topic that invites analysis and controversy. Thus, taking a position is crucial for fostering meaningful dialogue and understanding.