0
What else can I help you with?
Two specialised software tools for translation?
Compilers and interpreters.
What are the component of system programming?
various components of system programming are: - Assemblers - Interpreters - Compilers - Loaders - Macros
Write down three differences between compilers and interpreters?
complisr check entrie program at a time and gives errors and wrranings. but interpreters chech line by line. if any line having error it gives message . if u cleary error in that and goes to next line. otherwise checking in that line only. in java language use both compilers and interpreters
Advantages of interpreters over compilers in systems programming?
during testing of any code it is usefull, normally interpreters are slow as we need to interpret every time the code is to be executed , but for compilers object code generated can used for any no . of times . for a code to be interpreted it has to be completely in main memory .
What are three main types of language translators?
The three main types of language translators are compilers, interpreters, and assemblers. Compilers translate the entire source code into machine code before execution, interpreters execute code line by line, and assemblers translate assembly language code into machine code.
What is comment as used in programming?
It's a part of program ignored by compilers and/or interpreters, created mainly for source code documentation.
What do mnemonics mean?
High-level languages are converted into machine code using translation software, which is commonly included with programming software. Compilers and interpreters are the terms for these translators. Compilers and interpreters are used to translate programmes. To learn more about data science please visit- Learnbay.co
What are the recent softwares which are used by programmers?
Always the same: text-editors, compilers, linkage-editors, debuggers... well interpreters too. These are often integrated into so called IDEs (Integrated Developing Environment).
Is an interpreter better than a compiler?
Neither one will be categorically "better" than the other. In general, compilers produce more efficient programs, while interpreters produce more reusable code (platform independence).
What translators convert high-level language on statement-by-statement basis?
Machine level instructions can be converted to readable assembly language using a disassembler. If the machine instructions originated from a higher level language, there may also be a decompiler to create something resembling the original high level language version of the program.
Which one is faster scripter or compiler?
There is no simple answer to this question. Some compilers compile fast, others compile slow, and generate highly efficient or inefficient code. The same applies to scripting languages (which would better be classified interpreted languages or interpreters to contrast compiled languages or compilers).In today's languages and tools, the distinction between compiler and interpreter blurs. Most interpreters including compilation steps, for example to generate pre-compiled code and/or just-in-time compilation (e.g. Java and .NET languages). Other intermediate technologies exist.
What is the difference between assemblers interpreters and compilers?
Assemblers convert Assembly code to machine code Interpreters convert high level code to real-time machine code and store it in the memory for direct execution Compilers convert high level code to real-time machine code or some intermediate code and store it in a file for later execution Assemblers use the basic building blocks of the command processor code to write programs and is the language closest to the binary on which all computers operate, although it is difficult to use it does work well for things like networking and communication protocols. Interpreters are just what they say, they translate the code in real time as you operate the program, then process it, and are therefore the slowest. Compilers translate the code into a format the computer understands prior to the execution (or distribution) of the code and is therefore the easiest to use as it combines the better attributes of both programming methods into one easy to use package.
