I think that the answer is : Begging the question
Begging the question
Begging the questionScandalous
The plural of the noun premise (proposition) is premises.*The term premises is also used collectively to mean grounds or property.
The property, or land, or grounds, or sometimes acreage.
"Demised" means transferred by lease or otherwise for a limited time "premises" means a tract of land including its buildings or a building together with its grounds or other appurtenances.
No, the word 'premises' is the plural form of the singular noun 'premise' (sometimes spelled premiss).The noun 'premise' (and the plural premises) is a word for a proposition supporting or helping to support a conclusion; in law, the statement of facts upon which the complaint is based or an earlier statement in a document.The plural noun 'premises' is also an uncountable noun as a word for a tract of land including its buildings; a building or part of a building together with its grounds.
These are controversial because of the way they are distributed. They are not always given to the person who is most in need of them.
Without a context or a certain sense of what you mean by 'grounds' it is too vague to answer. Ground like the surface of earth, would be 地面 /ji men/. Grounds like in someone's/somewhere's premises or property would be 邸内 /tei nai/. Grounds meaning basis (of a belief, theory etc) could be 根拠 /kon kyou/. Grounds meaning evidence, basis can be 証拠 /shou ko/.
In a Lease agreement for a Building being constructed, it may say:'said premises and the building and other improvements thereon, upon completion of construction, are hereinafter called the "demised premises".'Etymology and usage: 'Premises' is from Medieval Latin praemissa, a plural word, meaning the "things mentioned before" and was used in legal documents. In Middle English, premises was defined as being "that property, collectively, which is specified in the beginning of a legal document and which is conveyed, as by grant, …". In due course premises was also legally extended to mean "a house or building with its grounds or appurtenances," a usage which was recorded before 1730.In a general sense today, premises means a piece of land together with the building(s) on it, or even just a building with all its parts. Therefore the word 'premises' is always plural when used in this way.
When a claim is made that the prmises of an argument (if True) provide inconrovertible grounds for th truth of is conclusion, that claim will be either correct or not correct. If it is correct, that argument is valid. If it is not correct (that is, if the premises when true tail to establish the conclusion irrefutably although claiming to do so), that argumnt is invalid.
This Comes strait off the Application:THE FOLLOWING PERSONS SHALL NOT PERFORM WORK ON GE PREMISES: A PERSON CONVICTED OF ANY FELONY, A PERSON CONVICTED OF A MISDEMEANOR INVOLVING VIOLENCE OR DISHONESTY IN THE PAST SEVEN YEARS. A PERSON CONVICTED OF MORE THAN TWO MISDEMEANORS IN THE PAST TWO YEARS SHALL NOT PERFORM WORK ON GE PREMISES UNLESS OTHERWISE AUTHORIZED BY GE AVIATION GLOBAL SECURITY. GE MAY REQUIRE PERSONS, BEFORE ENTERING GE PREMISES, TO COMPLETE A CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS QUESTIONNAIRE. IN THE EVENT THAT GE HAS GROUNDS TO BELIEVE THAT AN INDIVIDUAL HAS FALSIFIED THE CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS QUESTIONNAIRE IN ANY WAY, SUCH PERSON SHALL NOT PERFORM WORK ON GE PREMISES. GE RESERVES THE RIGHT, AT ITS DISCRETION, TO REQUEST FROM THE INDIVIDUAL'S EMPLOYER DOCUMENTATION OF THE COMPLETION OF A CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS RECORDS INVESTIGATION FOR ANY EMPLOYEE ASSIGNED TO WORK ON GE'S PREMISES. THE EMPLOYERS FAILURE TO HAVE COMPLETED A CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS INVESTIGATION OF ANY OF ITS EMPLOYEES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS CLAUSE SHALL BE GROUNDS FOR IMMEDIATE EXPULSION OF THE INDIVIDUAL FROM GE PREMISES AND GE SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO TERMINATE FOR DEFAULT ALL ORDERS. THE EMPLOYER SHALL INCLUDE THIS CLAUSE "DRUG TESTING AND SECURITY CHECKS" IN ANY SUBCONTRACT PLACED PURSUANT TO A GE ORDER WITH A SUBCONTRACTOR WHO WILL PERFORM WORK ON GE PREMISES.
Also in 1991, the confirmation of Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas became the center of a controversial firestorm related to a sexual harassment charge.