0
Dictionary.com and the American Heritage Dictionary both agree that hoarser is an acceptable word, though I've personally seen "more hoarse" used more often. I believe its primarily a style issue, rather than a strict rule.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is more prouder correct grammar?
No, "more prouder" is not correct grammar. "More proud" is the correct form to compare levels of pride.
Is more birthday's to come is correct in grammar?
No, the correct grammar would be "More birthdays to come."
How do you correct your grammar?
To correct grammar, you can use tools like grammar checkers or proofreading services. You can also improve by reviewing grammar rules and practicing writing regularly. Reading more can also help you become more familiar with correct grammar usage.
Is this grammar correct for your action immediately please?
The grammar in "Is this grammar correct for your action immediately please" is not correct. A more grammatically accurate way to phrase the question would be, "Is this grammar correct for your immediate action, please?"
What is the correct grammar of saying what else could you ask more?
The correct grammar is "What else could you ask for?" This phrase is commonly used to express satisfaction or contentment with a situation or outcome.
Is more prouder correct grammar?
No, "more prouder" is not correct grammar. "More proud" is the correct form to compare levels of pride.
What is the correct grammar of saying what else could you ask more?
The correct grammar is "What else could you ask for?" This phrase is commonly used to express satisfaction or contentment with a situation or outcome.
Is more birthday's to come is correct in grammar?
No, the correct grammar would be "More birthdays to come."
Is you were correct grammar?
Not at allAnother answer:If you mean 'Is the clause "you were" correct grammar?' the answer is 'yes'.If you mean 'Is the clause "is you were" correct grammar?' the answer is 'no'.If you had taken the trouble to write your question more clearly, you would have helped the people who you hoped would be helping you. Isn't that worth doing?
Is the sentence A little more chicken correct grammar?
No, it should be little more only.
What is the impact of correct grammar?
It will make the sentence more clear and understandable.
For more than 20 years of existence i just now had the time to visit here is a correct grammar?
For more than 20 years of existence i just now had the time to visit here is not a correct grammar.
For more than 20 years of existence this may be my first time to visit here is a correct grammar?
For more than 20 years of existence this may be my first time to visit here is not correct grammar.
Is you described to my mother and me correct grammar?
yes, "you discribed to my mother and me" is correct grammar, however the form of the question could be made more clear.
Is 'in a train' correct grammar?
Although "in a train" may seem correct, the more commonly used phrase is "on a train".
What is the correct grammar They have no excuse or They have no excuses?
Both are correct, but "They have no excuse" is more commonly used to convey the same meaning. The singular form "excuse" can be used to refer to multiple reasons, so it is sufficient on its own.
Correct pronunciation for your writing should be neater or more neat?
More neat, neater is not proper grammar.
