its the ademspher of the senter of the crust during the magma of popurlayerty an the boucy of the rotaion an the middle of the cluster an the center of the galaxy the to brave nights meat to gether an goin one an like a carbom dixcide like c20 and walter baloons got blone up into a glockcomer an its to rolll up earth an put on the other planets an side an set the tip on fire with the sun an filed the univers with glaxy smoke an that is the univers therory thank you com agian lol smily face
No 'Big Bang' .
The two other theories are straight line continuum.
And a universe that expands and contracts on a cyclic basis.
Currently we see the universe expanding at an ever increasing rate. If you look at the Sinusoidal curve it expands and contracts. At one point in its expansion the rate is increasing. Equivalent to the current universe. .
At some point in the future, tghat expansion rate will decrease and finally stop . The universe will then contract. If yopiu follow the sinusoidal curve from the top of the curve, its rate of steepness is increasing. then it will reach a point of inflexion where the rate of increase will stop and . The rate of increase will become slower, till you reach the bottom of the curve. The sinusoidal curve is a cyclic continuum, and the 'top' and 'bottom' of the sinusoidal curve are the 'Big Bang' points.
G
The whole of the universe cosmos works on a cyclic basis, down to out natural diurnal light change. Rotation & orbit of the Moon etc.,
It is just that the time limits are so huge we do not see this cyclic operation in play, but a universal expansion. .
The Cyclic Universe Theory suggests that new universes could potentially have different physical laws from our own universe. However, these laws would still need to allow for the existence of galaxies, stars, and planets for life to potentially emerge, as observed in our universe. Thus, while the laws may have some differences, they would likely still follow certain overarching principles to support the formation of complex structures.
Some potential problems with the Pulsating Universe Theory include lack of observational evidence, difficulty in reconciling with current understanding of cosmology, and challenges in providing a mechanism for the pulsations. The theory also faces criticisms regarding energy conservation and the feasibility of a cyclic universe model.
A cyclic universe is one that expands and contracts in a never-ending cycle, repeating the process of expansion and contraction indefinitely. This theory suggests that the universe goes through phases of expansion, followed by contraction, ultimately leading to a big crunch, and then starting the cycle again with a new big bang.
A theory of the origin and formation of the universe (the cosmos).
The theory that proposes the universe does not change with time is called the "block universe theory." It suggests that the past, present, and future all exist simultaneously and that time is just another dimension in which events occur. This theory challenges our traditional understanding of time as a linear progression from past to present to future.
The "Cyclic Model," AKA the "Oscillating Universe Model."
The Cyclic Universe Theory suggests that new universes could potentially have different physical laws from our own universe. However, these laws would still need to allow for the existence of galaxies, stars, and planets for life to potentially emerge, as observed in our universe. Thus, while the laws may have some differences, they would likely still follow certain overarching principles to support the formation of complex structures.
Some potential problems with the Pulsating Universe Theory include lack of observational evidence, difficulty in reconciling with current understanding of cosmology, and challenges in providing a mechanism for the pulsations. The theory also faces criticisms regarding energy conservation and the feasibility of a cyclic universe model.
The big bang theory is the prevailing scientific explanation for the origin of the universe. Other theories, such as the cyclic model or the multiverse hypothesis, involve different mechanisms for the universe's origin but are speculative and lack empirical support. At present, the big bang theory is the most widely accepted explanation supported by observational evidence.
The Oscillatory Universe is one of many cyclic cosmological model which promote the recycling of the Big Bang model upon a Big Crunch. However there is also the varied Multiverse hypotheses which promote the consideration of parallel universes existing uniquely independent of our universe.
A cyclic universe is one that expands and contracts in a never-ending cycle, repeating the process of expansion and contraction indefinitely. This theory suggests that the universe goes through phases of expansion, followed by contraction, ultimately leading to a big crunch, and then starting the cycle again with a new big bang.
According to Kepler's Universe theory, the universe was born in 4977 BC.
The no boundary universe theory was formulated in 1983.
Friedmann Universe Theory was created in 1922.
The Big Bang is the theory that was developed to describe the origins of the universe.
It is similar to the Big Bang theory. The ekpyrotic theory is, a theory that their is a parallel universe (More than one) In our universe.
With the Truth being Known for such a short amount of Time, that is to say just only the last one hundred Years or so; the Question Is: How can it be that Every Major Religion that has had Their Foundations constructed before the granitic Facts were known be either relevant or valid?As regards our own theory of the origin of the Universe, mentioning only scientific theories, there is the big bang theory which is all but undisputed. The question is now what caused the big bang? There is the cosmic egg theory, Membrane theory (m-theory), and several cyclic theories (my favorite The Big Crunch Theory).