0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Rational comprehensive theory of decision making?
The Rational Comprehensive theory of decision making is not to be confused with rational choice theory. The Rational Comprehensive Theory of decision making is a theory that when perceived as how decisions should be made is normative and when viewed as how decision are made is empirical. The Rational Comprehensive theory of decision making has six key elements. First, the decision maker is faced with a problem which can be isolated from other problems or at the minimum can be significantly considered in comparison to them. Secondly, the goals, values, and objectives motivating the decision maker are explicit and can be ranked according to importance. Thirdly, the alternative methods for dealing with the problem are scrutinized. Fourthly, the outcomes of each alternative (i.e. costs/benefits and advantages/disadvantages) are examined. Fifthly, each alternative along with its attendant outcomes is then compared with the other alternatives. The decision maker will choose the alternative, and its outcome, that maximizes attainment of his/her goals, values, and objectives (this is call optimization). The Rational comprehensive decision making theory has been criticized for its implausibility being such that it demands far more than is intellectually possible ignoring the decision makers probable lack of information, limited knowledge of costs/benefits of an alternative/limited ability to appraise all costs/benefits, difficulty in defining the problem at hand in the first place, and inapplicability to collective decision making where all values, beliefs, and objectives are not in perfect accord. Furthermore, sunk costs are often an issue affecting decision making and complicating the consideration of many alternatives impede on the fundamental idea of rational comprehensive decision making which demands consideration of ALL possible alternatives. In short, it is mostly viewed as unrealistic and idealistic.
What is the incremental concept of managerial economics?
Incremental analysis includes two concepts Incremental cost Incremental revenue IC is the additional cost incurred for additional output. In other words changes in cost due to changes in level of output. Whereas IR is the additional revenue from additional output or the changes in revenue due to changes in output. For every business decisions there is IR and IC. In order to determine whether the decision is sound or not we should compare the IC and IR of every decision. If the IR exceeds the IC, or IR is equal to IC the decision can be assumed as a sound decision.
Elaborate the cost concept is important for decision making?
Cost concept for Decision making ?
How does managerial economics bridge the gap between theory and business practices?
"Business economics integrates economic theory with business practice" Business economics is a special branch of economics that bridges gap between abstract theory and business practice. It deals with use of economic concepts and principles for decision making in a business unit. Hence, it is also called as Managerial Economics or Economics of the firm. Managerial economics is economics applied in the business decision making. Hence, it is also called Applied Economics. In simple words, business economics is the discipline which helps a business manager in decision making for achieving the desired results. In other words, it deals with the application of economic theory to business management.
How do you think good decision making contributed to the success of NASCAR?
A good decision making that contributed to the success of NASCAR was A good decision making that contributed to the success of NASCAR was
Decision making theory?
Decision making theory is used to determine the values and other issues, including uncertainties, that relate to the decision being made. It is then determined if the decision is a rational and wise decision to be made.
What theory says leadership is manipulative function?
decision making theory
What leadership theory uses a a decision tree to determine the appropriate level of participation by subordinates in decision-making?
fielders
How would you explain Vroom's expectancy theory?
Expectancy theory is about what one expects, the way they think when they are making a decision.
What has the author Simon French written?
Simon French has written: 'Decision behaviour, analysis and support' 'Decision theory' -- subject(s): Decision making
What has the author Nicola F Maaser written?
Nicola F. Maaser has written: 'Decision-making in committees' -- subject(s): Political planning, Public administration, Mathematical models, Game theory, Group decision making, Decision making
Why contribution theory is used as a basis for providing information relevant to decision making?
Fewhidiwj
What is Management Science Theory?
Management Science Theory gives a quantitative basis for decision making. It specially deals with the development of mathematical models to aid in decision making and problem solving. This theory holds that managing is a logical and rationale process, so it can be expressed in terms of mathematical models.
What has the author Derek W Bunn written?
Derek W. Bunn has written: 'Analysis for optimal decisions' -- subject(s): Decision making, Management science 'The synthesis of forecasting models in decision analysis' -- subject(s): Bayesian statistical decision theory, Decision making, Forecasting, Mathematical models 'Applied decisionanalysis' -- subject(s): Decision making, Decision-making, Mathematical models
What is the importance of decision theory?
Decision theory, the modeling and study of man's decision-making, is arguably most important because in learning how we make decisions, we can learn to make better ones. A link is provided to the Wikipedia article on decision theory, which, by the way, is subject of discreet mathematics. The curious person would surf on over and at least skim the article.
What is management science?
Management Science Theory gives a quantitative basis for decision making. It specially deals with the development of mathematical models to aid in decision making and problem solving. This theory holds that managing is a logical and rationale process, so it can be expressed in terms of mathematical models.
Rational comprehensive theory of decision making?
The Rational Comprehensive theory of decision making is not to be confused with rational choice theory. The Rational Comprehensive Theory of decision making is a theory that when perceived as how decisions should be made is normative and when viewed as how decision are made is empirical. The Rational Comprehensive theory of decision making has six key elements. First, the decision maker is faced with a problem which can be isolated from other problems or at the minimum can be significantly considered in comparison to them. Secondly, the goals, values, and objectives motivating the decision maker are explicit and can be ranked according to importance. Thirdly, the alternative methods for dealing with the problem are scrutinized. Fourthly, the outcomes of each alternative (i.e. costs/benefits and advantages/disadvantages) are examined. Fifthly, each alternative along with its attendant outcomes is then compared with the other alternatives. The decision maker will choose the alternative, and its outcome, that maximizes attainment of his/her goals, values, and objectives (this is call optimization). The Rational comprehensive decision making theory has been criticized for its implausibility being such that it demands far more than is intellectually possible ignoring the decision makers probable lack of information, limited knowledge of costs/benefits of an alternative/limited ability to appraise all costs/benefits, difficulty in defining the problem at hand in the first place, and inapplicability to collective decision making where all values, beliefs, and objectives are not in perfect accord. Furthermore, sunk costs are often an issue affecting decision making and complicating the consideration of many alternatives impede on the fundamental idea of rational comprehensive decision making which demands consideration of ALL possible alternatives. In short, it is mostly viewed as unrealistic and idealistic.
