0
What is drawing a general conclusion from specific facts or experiences?
Wiki User
∙ 10y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What kind of reasoning moves from specific to General facts in order to reach a conclusion?
deductive
What is a general conclusion?
a general conclusion is like an overall outcome. for example: the class' general conclusion was that there should be no homework for a week.
Which type of reasoning moves from specific facts to general facts in order reach a conclusion?
it ic called deduction
What is a method of proceeding from facts to a conclusion?
it ic called deduction
Do the premises sufficiently support the conclusions?
This depends on the specific premises and conclusion being evaluated. In general, premises that provide strong and relevant evidence in support of the conclusion can be considered sufficient. However, if there are logical gaps or missing information in the premises that weaken the connection to the conclusion, then the premises may not be sufficient. Critical analysis is necessary to determine whether the premises adequately support the conclusion.
What role do past experiences play in inductive reasoning?
Past experiences in inductive reasoning serve as the foundation upon which generalizations and predictions are made. By drawing on past observations, individuals can infer patterns, relationships, and trends to make educated guesses about future outcomes. However, it is important to acknowledge that inductive reasoning based solely on past experiences may not always lead to accurate conclusions, as it relies on probability rather than certainty.
This argument can move from a specific premise to a specific conclusion or from a general premise to a general conclusion?
An argument can move from a specific premise to a specific conclusion by providing detailed evidence or examples to support the specific claim. On the other hand, an argument can move from a general premise to a general conclusion by making a broad assertion based on the general principle presented. Both forms of arguments can be effective depending on the context and the strength of the premises.
His argument can move from a specific premise to a specific conclusion or from a general premise to a general conclusion?
Yes, arguments can move from a specific premise to a specific conclusion, which is known as a deductive argument. They can also move from a general premise to a general conclusion, which is known as an inductive argument. The structure and validity of the argument depend on the relationship between the premise and conclusion.
What is inductive reasoning moves from what to what?
The use of a specific observation to reach a general conclusion. (APEX)
Inductive reasoning is best defined as?
drawing a general conclusion from one's observations
Inductive reasoning is best defined?
Inductive reasoning is a type of reasoning that involves drawing general conclusions based on specific observations or evidence. It is used to make predictions about future events or outcomes, but the conclusions are not guaranteed to be true. It is a common method in scientific research and everyday decision-making.
The process of arriving at a specific conclusion based on previously accepted general statements?
The process of arriving at a specific conclusion based on previously accepted general statements? Is called extrapolation.
Inductive reasoning is drawing conclusions from observations?
general; specific
What is an argument that starts from a specific idea to a general conclusion?
Inductive.
What type of argument can move from a specific premise to a specific conclusion or from a general premise to a general conclusion?
Valid ArgumentThanks to the above answerer, I got this question wrong on my quiz.The correct answer is Valid argument.
Reasoning moves from general to specific in order to reach a conclusion?
Deductive
What is a argument that starts from a specific idea to reach a general conclusion?
Inductive.
