0
What else can I help you with?
What kind of reasoning moves from specific to General facts in order to reach a conclusion?
deductive
What is a general conclusion?
a general conclusion is like an overall outcome. for example: the class' general conclusion was that there should be no homework for a week.
Which type of reasoning moves from specific facts to general facts in order reach a conclusion?
it ic called deduction
What type of reasoning involves applying general principles ti a specific case?
The type of reasoning that involves applying general principles to a specific case is known as deductive reasoning. In deductive reasoning, one starts with a general statement or hypothesis and uses it to draw conclusions about a specific instance. This logical approach ensures that if the general principles are true, the specific conclusion must also be true.
What is a method of proceeding from facts to a conclusion?
it ic called deduction
What is an argument known as that starts from a more general idea to reach a more specific conclusion?
That type of argument is known as deductive reasoning. It involves drawing a specific conclusion based on a general premise or set of premises.
What is a argument that starts from a specific idea to reach a general conclusion?
Inductive.
His argument can move from a specific premise to a specific conclusion or from a general premise to a general conclusion?
Yes, arguments can move from a specific premise to a specific conclusion, which is known as a deductive argument. They can also move from a general premise to a general conclusion, which is known as an inductive argument. The structure and validity of the argument depend on the relationship between the premise and conclusion.
What role do past experiences play in inductive reasoning?
Past experiences in inductive reasoning serve as the foundation upon which generalizations and predictions are made. By drawing on past observations, individuals can infer patterns, relationships, and trends to make educated guesses about future outcomes. However, it is important to acknowledge that inductive reasoning based solely on past experiences may not always lead to accurate conclusions, as it relies on probability rather than certainty.
Inductive reasoning is best defined as?
drawing a general conclusion from one's observations
This argument can move from a specific premise to a specific conclusion or from a general premise to a general conclusion?
An argument can move from a specific premise to a specific conclusion by providing detailed evidence or examples to support the specific claim. On the other hand, an argument can move from a general premise to a general conclusion by making a broad assertion based on the general principle presented. Both forms of arguments can be effective depending on the context and the strength of the premises.
What is inductive reasoning moves from what to what?
The use of a specific observation to reach a general conclusion. (APEX)
What is an example of a deductive-reasoning?
An example of deductive reasoning is: All men are mortal. John is a man. Therefore, John is mortal. It involves drawing a specific conclusion based on general premises or facts.
Inductive reasoning is drawing conclusions from observations?
general; specific
What is an argument that starts from a specific idea to a general conclusion?
Inductive.
What is deductive explanation?
Deductive explanation is a process of reasoning that starts with general principles or premises and applies them to specific situations to arrive at a conclusion. It involves drawing logical inferences to demonstrate how the premises necessarily lead to the conclusion. It is a top-down approach that aims to demonstrate the validity of a conclusion based on the truth of the premises.
Why is deductive reasoning stronger that inductive reasoning?
Deductive reasoning is considered stronger because it involves drawing specific conclusions from general principles or premises that are assumed to be true. In deductive reasoning, if the premises are true and the logic is valid, then the conclusion must also be true. In contrast, inductive reasoning involves drawing general conclusions from specific observations, which makes it more prone to errors and uncertainties.
