0
writing to show your personal opinion
What else can I help you with?
What is political editorializing rule?
The political editorializing rule prohibits broadcasters in the United States from airing editorial opinions on political candidates without also offering opposing viewpoints. This rule aims to ensure fair and balanced coverage of political issues.
How would you describe the purpose for Jerry Barnett's cartoons?
The purpose for Jerry Barnett's cartoons was editorializing prominent people in society, especially politics, and characterize the person in a humorous way.
What is a sentence with the word journalist?
She's a very good writer with an inquisitive mind and she'd make a great investigative journalist. The job of a journalist is to report the facts without editorializing. How has the internet impacted the careers of journalists?
How do you disable the seat belt warning alarm in a 2006 Dodge Caravan SXT?
Stop complaining and put your seat belt on, or you might end up like the guy I saw the other day, whose car overturned, he was thrown out of the side window, somersaulted in the air, hit the highway and then got hit by a car travelling in the opposite direction. Seat belts are there to protect you, so you should not need to disconnect the reminder. Tip: If you don't know the answer to a question, say "I don't know" rather than editorializing.
What do you call a person who speaks on the radio?
If the person only reads what is given them, without remark or editorializing, then that person is an Announcer. If the person reads the given material and also adds supplementary material or personal remarks, that person is a Commentator. You may have heard on sportscasts the term Color Commentator. This is an individual whose job is to provide "colorful" vignettes of related information. Such as "John, few people know that last year, Frankie not only rushed for 1300 yards, but he gave a rousing performance in a local production of Annie Get Your Gun in San Bernardino."
A dispute erupts at the academy awards on the red carpet two startlets are shocked to find there wearing the same gown your reading accounts of the dispute which account is least likely to be biased?
The account least likely to be biased would likely come from an impartial news source that focuses on reporting the facts rather than sensationalizing the event. This account would present quotes from both startlets, describe the situation without favoring one over the other, and avoid editorializing or expressing personal opinions. In contrast, accounts from tabloids or entertainment blogs might exaggerate the drama or lean towards a particular narrative to attract attention.
What is the difference between a feature article and an editorial?
A feature article is supposed to highlight an interesting aspect of human life. For example, a cancer survivor, someone who has climbed Mount Everest, etc. In other words it is a story that is meant to catch a reader's attention. This type of story is also very factual. There is very little or no room for editorializing, or trying to persuade the reader to do something. On the other hand an editorial is a persuasive piece designed to make the reader think or to do something. This doesn't have to be a human interest story. This is usually more intellectual and has numerical facts or quotes that back up the writers opinion, which is what the article is based on.
What is another word for 'foreground' in this sentence Discuss the perspectives of womanhood foregrounded in history and the extent to which the view has changed or remained the same.?
(Forgive me for editorializing in an answer, but I never understood this either until I went back to school to get my PhD. I learned there are certain words and phrases that mainly occur in academic writing: these are expressions that are used in a special way by scholars from fields like communication, cultural studies, feminist studies, and some areas of sociology. "Foregrounded" is one of those words. Another is "hegemony." Another is "discursive." It's like learning a new language!) To foreground something is to give it prominence, to call specific attention to it, to place your focus on it. So the question is asking what specific beliefs and perspectives (what attitudes and opinions, in other words) about the "proper" role of women used to dominate the culture; and how have those opinions and attitudes changed over the years... or in some cases, how have these views remained the same?
What sentence has 7 syllables?
I am good at knitting wool.
Were native Americans conquered because they were inferior?
No. In fact, one could argue that Native Americans were spiritually and socially superior to their conquerors in many ways. Native Americans were defeated over a long span of time because they had a sustainable lifestyle and mindset, opposed to the acquisitive lifestyle of the Western Europeans who sought new lands in the Americas. While Native Americans could be fierce warriors, their focus was on living in touch with the land they occupied. As hunters, gatherers and in some cases agrarians, Native Americans in general appreciated Nature and understood their dependence on it. Many tribes did not have a concept of owning land, but felt they were a part of it. The Western Europeans, however, were avaricious when it came to accumulating land and wealth. They exploited natural resources in such a way that it could be said that they raped Nature and felt no relationship to it other than ownership. Their technology was more advanced than that of the Native Americans, and did play a role in the decimation and utter defeat of the native peoples. A little editorializing here. Could a mechanized, acquisitive approach to life be said to be "superior"? Pehaps not. Americans as a civilization are today so threatened by climate change and lack of resources that we would do well to investigate and return to the more sustainable practices of the Native Americans.
How do you get citizenship in Canada if you are a American?
Be sure you have looked into the American Government system before you make any long term plans. It is falling apart. Also the health care system here is pathetic. How can I become a Canadian citizen? * haha the previous poster is right .. America isn't what it used to be (thanks to our current "leaders"). That said, it is very difficult to become an American citizen. Unless you have immediate family who are American citizens, or are a highly skilled/college educated person, it can be next to and including, impossible. Good luck! * No editorializing on this one. Just as any other immigrant to the United States, a Canadian can take out American citizenship after living in the U.S. without a criminal record for five years and passing a test in American civics and history. Recently Pam Anderson did, so the U.S. is not really all that picky. (Oops, I forgot about the no editorializing!) Also, as a Canadian, I'd like to say that you are welcome to move into my basement. We'll see what happens in November, but 4 more years of a Republican executive might mean that I need to buy a bigger house ;-)
How do you have a good news lead?
A good news lead should start with one of the 5 W's and the H the event that is being written on:* WHO: This lead is mostly about an individual or group involved with something, don't use this one, except in rare cases.WHAT: Explains what is going on. This is probably going to be the one used most often.WHEN: Explains when something is going to/did happen. Usually not a good one unless writing for a special occasion (i.e. wedding, a Presidential visit.)WHERE: Explains where the event takes place. Not good in most cases.WHY: Starts a story be telling the reader why an event is happening. This is used most often for editorials although is also commonly used for news stories.HOW: Tells the reader how something was accomplished. This is an average lead. Sometimes it works and others it doesn't.*Although it is a good rule of thumb is to use the first sentence of the lead paragraph to dictate what the story will talk about using the above criteria. It is still important to use all or most of them in the lead paragraph.A straight news lead should have no "editorializing" in it (no opinion). And does not begin with the date or "On Tuesday, Dec. 5........." This can begin to sound boring.An example:"A contractor laid down the final touches on the new Leaguetown Library in the early hours on Friday, Dec. 5. The library's construction has been funded by the Leaguetown Literacy Society since its start at the beginning of April. The Society says that its reasons for funding are to ensure that the future of Leaguetown has a place for anyone to just sit down and read a book."Who: Leaguetown Literary SocietyWhat: Leaguetown Library finishes construction.(This was my lead sentence although the rest of the lead paragraph describes the other W&H's)When: early Friday, Dec. 5Where: LeaguetownWhy: To ensure that the future of Leaguetown has a place for anyone to just sit down and read a book.How: It was funded by the Leaguetown Literacy Society.
