I am a living evidence for the existence of God. If you know me, you will understand.
I am surrounded by lot of negative forces (spirits). I am scolding them daily. I think most of the people or almost all people are hearing my voices as well as evil spirits’ voices everyday.
At present all creatures including human beings are living in a miraculous era of God. This is a temporary miracle of God. I am connected to all creatures including human beings and spirits internally by God since year 1950 but I am not a God. I think that all human beings can see what I see, can hear what I hear and even know my thoughts. But thoughts are complicated matter. It needs an explanation. The people who have born in this era cannot realize this miracle because they have born with it. An old brave and honest gentleman aged 85 can explain about this miracle.
Not likely. Coincidences are evidence of coincidence, or if you will, random chaos, which is what the universe is all about. Asking if they are evidence of God's existence is like asking if water is evidence of a fish's existence.
Science does not provide direct evidence for the existence of God as it focuses on natural phenomena and observable data. The existence of God is a matter of faith and belief, which is beyond the scope of scientific inquiry.
Just as there is no evidence for the existence of God, so there is no evidence for the existence of the Holy Ghost. It is a matter of faith, and faith alone.
AnswerNo, it is not fear - it is being rational. Since there is no evidence for the existence of God, it follows that there is no evidence that Jesus is the son of God, and no evidence that he can save us from a hell, the existence of which is purely conjecture.
Evidence for the existence of a higher power, such as God, can include philosophical arguments like the cosmological argument, teleological argument, and moral argument. These arguments suggest that the complexity of the universe, the order and design in nature, and the existence of objective moral values point towards the existence of a higher power. Additionally, personal experiences, historical accounts, and religious texts are often cited as evidence for the existence of God.
A secular worldview typically approaches the question of God's existence from a rational and evidence-based perspective, often relying on scientific explanations and empirical evidence to understand the world. In the absence of empirical evidence for the existence of God, a secular worldview generally leans towards skepticism or atheism. This perspective emphasizes the importance of critical thinking, logic, and empirical evidence in forming beliefs about the existence of supernatural entities like God.
Humanity wants visual or scientific evidence of God's existence but the signs are all around us
there is no evidence that proves or disproves the existence of god, so asserting that a god or gods exist or don't exist is a waste of time due to a lack of evidence for both sides.
Atheism is the lack of belief in a god or gods, while agnosticism is the belief that the existence of a god or gods is unknown or unknowable. Atheists assert that there is no evidence for the existence of a deity, whereas agnostics question whether such evidence could ever be found.
Yes, no-one has found any proof that god exists. Not one scrap of evidence.
Depends who you ask. To me and other Heathens, Asatruar, and the Theodish, they would say yes. Just like any other God, is there any hard scientific evidence for his existence? No. Is lack of proof of existence proof of lack of existence? Again, No.
Agnosticism is the belief that the existence of God or the supernatural is unknown or unknowable. It is a philosophical stance that asserts that there is not enough evidence to prove or disprove the existence of a higher power.