Source: Meyer, Stephen C. "DNA by Design." Lecture.There are twenty possible protein-forming amino acids. To get a chain of amino acids merely ten sites long, it is 20^10 or 10,000,000,000,000 possible combinations. However, some of the shortest proteins are 150 sites long, with most actually being 3-400. That means that for a tiny strand of only 150 sites, your possible combinations are 20^150 or 10^195! There are only 10^80 elementary particles (protons, neutrons, electrons) in the whole universe! How likely is it that we ever get a complete protein to arise by chance, given all the amino acids interacting in the pre-biotic soup given billions of years? According to Doug Axe, the functional sequences of amino acids as compared to all the possible sequences of amino acids are 1 to 10^74. Between each of these amino acids, there is a type of bond called a peptide bond. In nature, only half of the bonds that form between amino acids are peptide bonds. For the entire strand (149 bonds, rounded up to 150 to make a round number), that leads up to a probability of 10^45. Also, when you're building a protein, amino acids come in two types of optical isomers; left-handed and right-handed. The left-handed version is the only type that can be used in building amino acids. At 150 amino acids, that means we have another 10^45 chance. Putting these together, that means to form a functional protein by chance, we have a total probability of 1 in 10^164. There have only been 10^16 seconds since the big bang, there have only been 10^139 events happen since the beginning of the universe, and once again, there are only 10^80 elementary particles in the universe. However, all this time, we've been talking about one single protein. Estimates to form a minimally complex single-celled organism say that it requires between 250 and 400 different proteins to do this. There are vastly more in the human body, not to mention we also have specialized cells to do certain tasks requiring certain additional proteins.Though it is indeed possible, granted enough time, life could develop from simple chemicals, the universe (according to recent evidence found by the Hubble Space Telescope) is a maximum of 20 billion years old and this is nowhere near enough time in which to complete this process, even had the earth existed in the right state with all of the right conditions from the very beginning.
This is not all of the evidence, merely the evidence that exists in the formation of DNA.
Yes.Tradition, not just theory. There are Creation-narratives all over the world; tens of them if not hundreds. This is because the Creation was a tradition going all the way back and shared by all mankind. As time passed, most of these stories became infiltrated by idolatry, with a phantasmagoria of warring deities. It is the Torah, in Genesis, which preserves the original.See also:Is there evidence for Creation?
"Evidence". There's no special term to distinguish evidence supporting one theory in science from evidence supporting any other theory in science.
" Genesis theory!?!? " If you mean the Judeo-Christian creation myth then you are in the wrong section. This is a Western creation myth that has no basis in science and is certainly not a theory.
The Big Bang theory is the current scientific theory used to explain the origin of the universe.
Yes. If evolution was not widely supported by evidence, then it would be regarded as a hypothesis rather than a theory.
The belief in Creation is as old as humanity. It is a worldwide tradition (not theory) going back to the earliest evidence of human society. See also:Is there evidence for Creation?Can you show that God exists?Seeing God's wisdom
Creationism is a belief system that asserts that the universe and living beings originate from specific acts of divine creation. From a scientific perspective, creationism is considered a myth rather than a theory because it lacks empirical evidence and does not adhere to the scientific method of investigation and naturalistic explanations.
Yes.Tradition, not just theory. There are Creation-narratives all over the world; tens of them if not hundreds. This is because the Creation was a tradition going all the way back and shared by all mankind. As time passed, most of these stories became infiltrated by idolatry, with a phantasmagoria of warring deities. It is the Torah, in Genesis, which preserves the original.See also:Is there evidence for Creation?
Creation Evidence Museum was created in 1984.
There is no scientific theory of creation.
Creation Boot Camp - 2005 Evidence for Creation 1-10 was released on: USA: 2005
Theory of Creation is not an acknowledge scientific theory. Science proposed Abiogenesis where life come to exist without need of creation. The Theory of Creation that require the supreme being to create life namely Intelligent Design (ID) had no root of support at all for the existence of God, Deities or Supreme being and their action. The Theory of Abiogenesis while lack of evidence supporting the full process, ID in other hand had nothing at all. The Theory of Creation by far believe in using irreducible complex to stated the process of Abiogenesis impossibility but it had nothing supporting even the existence of the creator. Degree of controversies among Religion to Science varies among religion of concern. Abrahamic's supporter usually in denial of the Abiogenesis theory and try to coin up their theory of creation. Indian's origin usually had nothing to concern or against the Abiogenesis and let the Science be. After all, even if Abiogenesis is not compatible to some of religions, it should not be put to bother since Abiogenesis is still on the long way of study. If the story of creation would be true, there would be the evidence in supporting. What we should do is seeking of evidence and not let the faith blind human process of seeking out truth.
"Evidence". There's no special term to distinguish evidence supporting one theory in science from evidence supporting any other theory in science.
That phrase is synonymous with Intelligent Design, which states that the complexity and purposefulness of every living thing demonstrates that life had an intelligent designer, God. See also:Is there evidence for Creation?Can you show that God exists?Seeing God's wisdom
A scientific theory is supported by evidence. Without evidence, it is only a hypothesis.
Creation Today - 2011 What Is the Best Evidence for Biblical Creation 2-18 was released on: USA: 2012
Creation Today - 2011 What Is the Most Compelling Evidence for Creation 2-16 was released on: USA: 2012