Source: Meyer, Stephen C. "DNA by Design." Lecture.There are twenty possible protein-forming amino acids. To get a chain of amino acids merely ten sites long, it is 20^10 or 10,000,000,000,000 possible combinations. However, some of the shortest proteins are 150 sites long, with most actually being 3-400. That means that for a tiny strand of only 150 sites, your possible combinations are 20^150 or 10^195! There are only 10^80 elementary particles (protons, neutrons, electrons) in the whole universe! How likely is it that we ever get a complete protein to arise by chance, given all the amino acids interacting in the pre-biotic soup given billions of years? According to Doug Axe, the functional sequences of amino acids as compared to all the possible sequences of amino acids are 1 to 10^74. Between each of these amino acids, there is a type of bond called a peptide bond. In nature, only half of the bonds that form between amino acids are peptide bonds. For the entire strand (149 bonds, rounded up to 150 to make a round number), that leads up to a probability of 10^45. Also, when you're building a protein, amino acids come in two types of optical isomers; left-handed and right-handed. The left-handed version is the only type that can be used in building amino acids. At 150 amino acids, that means we have another 10^45 chance. Putting these together, that means to form a functional protein by chance, we have a total probability of 1 in 10^164. There have only been 10^16 seconds since the big bang, there have only been 10^139 events happen since the beginning of the universe, and once again, there are only 10^80 elementary particles in the universe. However, all this time, we've been talking about one single protein. Estimates to form a minimally complex single-celled organism say that it requires between 250 and 400 different proteins to do this. There are vastly more in the human body, not to mention we also have specialized cells to do certain tasks requiring certain additional proteins.Though it is indeed possible, granted enough time, life could develop from simple chemicals, the universe (according to recent evidence found by the Hubble Space Telescope) is a maximum of 20 billion years old and this is nowhere near enough time in which to complete this process, even had the earth existed in the right state with all of the right conditions from the very beginning.
This is not all of the evidence, merely the evidence that exists in the formation of DNA.
As a machine learning model, I don't have personal beliefs. The theory of creation is a matter of individual faith and interpretation, with some beliefs attributing the origins of the universe to a divine creator or higher power. Scientists generally rely on evidence-based explanations like the Big Bang theory to understand the origins of the universe.
Evolution is widely accepted by the scientific community because it is supported by mountains of evidence from various fields like genetics, paleontology, and biochemistry. It is considered a scientific theory, which means it is a well-substantiated explanation based on evidence. Biblical Creation, on the other hand, is a belief based on religious texts rather than empirical evidence, and therefore is not considered a scientific explanation.
The scientific theory of creation is not a recognized scientific theory. In science, the prevailing theory explaining the origins of the universe, Earth, and life is the theory of evolution by natural selection, which is supported by a large body of evidence from various scientific disciplines such as biology, genetics, geology, and paleontology. Creationism, on the other hand, is a belief system rooted in religious or mythological explanations for the origins of the universe and life.
No, evolution is widely supported by scientific evidence and is considered a fundamental principle of biology. There is no credible scientific theory that opposes evolution.
The theory of organic evolution posits that species change over time through the process of natural selection, while special creation holds that species were individually created by a divine being and do not change over time. Evolution is supported by extensive scientific evidence, while special creation is a belief based on religious or philosophical perspectives.
The belief in Creation is as old as humanity. It is a worldwide tradition (not theory) going back to the earliest evidence of human society. See also:Is there evidence for Creation?Can you show that God exists?Seeing God's wisdom
Creation Evidence Museum was created in 1984.
There is no scientific theory of creation.
As a machine learning model, I don't have personal beliefs. The theory of creation is a matter of individual faith and interpretation, with some beliefs attributing the origins of the universe to a divine creator or higher power. Scientists generally rely on evidence-based explanations like the Big Bang theory to understand the origins of the universe.
Creationism is a belief system that asserts that the universe and living beings originate from specific acts of divine creation. From a scientific perspective, creationism is considered a myth rather than a theory because it lacks empirical evidence and does not adhere to the scientific method of investigation and naturalistic explanations.
The most widely accepted theory for the Moon's creation is the Giant Impact Hypothesis, which suggests that a Mars-sized object collided with the early Earth, ejecting debris that eventually coalesced to form the Moon. This theory is supported by evidence such as the Moon's composition and orbital dynamics.
Evolution is widely accepted by the scientific community because it is supported by mountains of evidence from various fields like genetics, paleontology, and biochemistry. It is considered a scientific theory, which means it is a well-substantiated explanation based on evidence. Biblical Creation, on the other hand, is a belief based on religious texts rather than empirical evidence, and therefore is not considered a scientific explanation.
One early idea about the creation of the universe is the Steady State Theory, which suggests that the universe has always existed and will continue to exist indefinitely without any beginning or end. This theory was proposed as an alternative to the Big Bang theory but has since been largely discredited by the observational evidence.
Creation Boot Camp - 2005 Evidence for Creation 1-10 was released on: USA: 2005
That phrase is synonymous with Intelligent Design, which states that the complexity and purposefulness of every living thing demonstrates that life had an intelligent designer, God. See also:Is there evidence for Creation?Can you show that God exists?Seeing God's wisdom
The scientific theory of creation is not a recognized scientific theory. In science, the prevailing theory explaining the origins of the universe, Earth, and life is the theory of evolution by natural selection, which is supported by a large body of evidence from various scientific disciplines such as biology, genetics, geology, and paleontology. Creationism, on the other hand, is a belief system rooted in religious or mythological explanations for the origins of the universe and life.
Creation Today - 2011 What Is the Most Compelling Evidence for Creation 2-16 was released on: USA: 2012