0
What else can I help you with?
Is there a credible scientific theory that opposes evolution?
No, evolution is widely supported by scientific evidence and is considered a fundamental principle of biology. There is no credible scientific theory that opposes evolution.
What is creation theory?
It is not a theory; it is an ancient tradition. It states that the universe, and everything in it, originated through supernatural events (Creation), not random Evolution. See also:Is there evidence against EvolutionCan you show that God existsGod's wisdom seen in His creationsMore about God's wisdom
Why is Evolution taken as fact rather than theory versus Biblical Creation?
Evolution is widely accepted by the scientific community because it is supported by mountains of evidence from various fields like genetics, paleontology, and biochemistry. It is considered a scientific theory, which means it is a well-substantiated explanation based on evidence. Biblical Creation, on the other hand, is a belief based on religious texts rather than empirical evidence, and therefore is not considered a scientific explanation.
What is a difference between the theory of organic evolution and that of special creation?
The theory of organic evolution posits that species change over time through the process of natural selection, while special creation holds that species were individually created by a divine being and do not change over time. Evolution is supported by extensive scientific evidence, while special creation is a belief based on religious or philosophical perspectives.
How does the account of Creation compare to cell theory?
The account of Creation in various religions describes the origin of life as being created by a higher power or entity. In contrast, cell theory is a scientific principle that explains that all living organisms are composed of cells, which are the basic unit of life. The two concepts differ in their perspectives on the origin and functioning of life.
Does Dr George Marshall support creation theory?
There is no scientific theory of creation.
Is there scientific proof for creation?
There is no scientific proof of a biblical creation. That is a matter of faith alone. The scientific consensus is that the universe came about as a result of an event popularly called the "Big Bang" which occurred around 13.7 billion years ago.For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
What is Oscillation theory?
the oscillating theory of the universe suggests that the creation of this universe followed the death of the last universe. bethany punter wrote this - scientific genius :) hey scientific genius :) (bethany punter)
Is there a credible scientific theory that opposes evolution?
No, evolution is widely supported by scientific evidence and is considered a fundamental principle of biology. There is no credible scientific theory that opposes evolution.
What is creation theory?
It is not a theory; it is an ancient tradition. It states that the universe, and everything in it, originated through supernatural events (Creation), not random Evolution. See also:Is there evidence against EvolutionCan you show that God existsGod's wisdom seen in His creationsMore about God's wisdom
Is creationism a myth or a theory?
Creationism is a belief system that asserts that the universe and living beings originate from specific acts of divine creation. From a scientific perspective, creationism is considered a myth rather than a theory because it lacks empirical evidence and does not adhere to the scientific method of investigation and naturalistic explanations.
What is the difference a scientific theory and scientific law?
A scientific theory is an explanation of some natural phenomenon. A scientific law is a succinct statement of some aspect of a scientific theory.
What is the difference a scientific theory and a scientific law?
A scientific theory is an explanation of some natural phenomenon. A scientific law is a succinct statement of some aspect of a scientific theory.
Why is Evolution taken as fact rather than theory versus Biblical Creation?
Evolution is widely accepted by the scientific community because it is supported by mountains of evidence from various fields like genetics, paleontology, and biochemistry. It is considered a scientific theory, which means it is a well-substantiated explanation based on evidence. Biblical Creation, on the other hand, is a belief based on religious texts rather than empirical evidence, and therefore is not considered a scientific explanation.
What is the difference between scientific theory?
Between Scientific Theory and what?
What is required for a theory to be scientific?
Scientific observations and experimental results are required for a theory to be scientific.
Are Religious and Scientific Theories of Creation Compatible?
Theory of Creation is not an acknowledge scientific theory. Science proposed Abiogenesis where life come to exist without need of creation. The Theory of Creation that require the supreme being to create life namely Intelligent Design (ID) had no root of support at all for the existence of God, Deities or Supreme being and their action. The Theory of Abiogenesis while lack of evidence supporting the full process, ID in other hand had nothing at all. The Theory of Creation by far believe in using irreducible complex to stated the process of Abiogenesis impossibility but it had nothing supporting even the existence of the creator. Degree of controversies among Religion to Science varies among religion of concern. Abrahamic's supporter usually in denial of the Abiogenesis theory and try to coin up their theory of creation. Indian's origin usually had nothing to concern or against the Abiogenesis and let the Science be. After all, even if Abiogenesis is not compatible to some of religions, it should not be put to bother since Abiogenesis is still on the long way of study. If the story of creation would be true, there would be the evidence in supporting. What we should do is seeking of evidence and not let the faith blind human process of seeking out truth.
