Theory of Creation is not an acknowledge scientific theory. Science proposed Abiogenesis where life come to exist without need of creation.
The Theory of Creation that require the supreme being to create life namely Intelligent Design (ID) had no root of support at all for the existence of God, Deities or Supreme being and their action. The Theory of Abiogenesis while lack of evidence supporting the full process, ID in other hand had nothing at all. The Theory of Creation by far believe in using irreducible complex to stated the process of Abiogenesis impossibility but it had nothing supporting even the existence of the creator.
Degree of controversies among Religion to Science varies among religion of concern. Abrahamic's supporter usually in denial of the Abiogenesis theory and try to coin up their theory of creation. Indian's origin usually had nothing to concern or against the Abiogenesis and let the Science be.
After all, even if Abiogenesis is not compatible to some of religions, it should not be put to bother since Abiogenesis is still on the long way of study. If the story of creation would be true, there would be the evidence in supporting. What we should do is seeking of evidence and not let the faith blind human process of seeking out truth.
It would be difficult to find a definite answer for that question. However, there are at least two peer reviewed journals which are dedicated to publishing creation theories. These are Journal of Creation published by CMI, and CRSQ, published by the creation research society.
The two creation theories that address the length of a day are the Young Earth Creationism (YEC) and the Day-Age Theory. YEC posits that the Earth is relatively young, typically interpreting the "days" of creation in Genesis as 24-hour periods. In contrast, the Day-Age Theory suggests that these "days" represent longer epochs or ages, allowing for an interpretation that accommodates geological and astronomical evidence for an older Earth. Both theories reflect different approaches to reconciling religious texts with scientific understanding.
Scientific theories can be changed or replaced when there has been significant evidence for the change. The scientific method must be used to create a new hypothesis, which must then be proven.
The concept of the world as we know it was not invented by any one person. The world's existence and formation is attributed to natural processes and scientific theories such as the Big Bang theory for the creation of the universe and Earth's formation over billions of years.
Not scientific law because there are too many possibilities, no-one can tell for sure.
no.
holas
The religious community had varied responses to new theories about the universe and nature: some embraced them as uncovering the complexities of God's creation, others viewed them with suspicion as challenging traditional beliefs, and a few outright rejected them as conflicting with religious doctrine. Overall, there was a mix of acceptance, resistance, and attempts to reconcile scientific discoveries with theological understanding.
It would be difficult to find a definite answer for that question. However, there are at least two peer reviewed journals which are dedicated to publishing creation theories. These are Journal of Creation published by CMI, and CRSQ, published by the creation research society.
Some theories about the creation of man include religious beliefs such as creationism, which posits that a divine being created humans; scientific theory of evolution, which suggests that humans evolved from earlier species through natural selection; and cultural myths and legends that vary across different societies and civilizations. Each theory offers a unique perspective on the origin of humanity.
How do scientific theories develop and change?
Evolution doesn't have to be compatible with Faith. Evolution is a fact. It happened. A person can believe in God while also understanding that evolution is a very real scientific process.
scientific theories are needed because they just are heheehee:D
Scientific theories.
maths is useful to tell scientific theories becaus
Scientists make use of theories in order to gain further scientific knowledge
why are theories sometimes replaced by new theories