It doesn't have to.
Yes, physical natural laws that govern how things work can be investigated through the scientific method. This involves making observations, forming hypotheses, conducting experiments, and analyzing data to gain a better understanding of these laws. The scientific method allows researchers to test and validate theories about the natural world based on empirical evidence.
A statement about a natural phenomenon is not necessarily scientific, but if the phenomenon has been studied in detail and the scientific method applied, then the statement becomes scientific. Example: The Sun rises in the east and sets in the west is not a scientific statement, but if the rising and setting is studied and angles noted over a 12-month period, and a theory is formed to explain it which says that the Earth rotates about an axis that is inclined to its orbit round the Sun, with numbers, that is scientific. Being scientific does not mean it is the truth or even correct because it might be disproved, or another better theory can always come along later, but at least it is scientific.
They are not the same, theory is just that, it may be provable in some instances, but cannot be positivity applied to all cases, law however can. Their similarity is that they both require some proof, but law needs to be proven to be true for all cases.
Laws describe observed phenomena and relationships in nature, while theories explain why those phenomena occur based on tested hypotheses and evidence. Laws are more descriptive and specific, while theories are broader and provide a framework for understanding natural phenomena.
Scientific laws and scientific theories are both established principles in science that explain natural phenomena. Laws describe empirical observations and relationships, while theories provide explanations for why and how those observations occur. Both are fundamental to our understanding of the natural world and are supported by empirical evidence.
Learning in the natural world does not start with memorizing scientific laws and theories. It starts with the child exploring those facts while playing.
It doesn't have to.
Scientific theories usually come before scientific laws. Theories are comprehensive explanations of a wide range of observations and data, while laws are concise statements describing specific relationships or patterns within a system. Theories often precede the formulation of laws as they help to understand and predict natural phenomena before they can be distilled into succinct laws.
The main similarity between scientific theories and scientific laws is that both are supported by extensive evidence and are used to explain natural phenomena. However, theories are broader explanations that can be modified or refined based on new evidence, while laws are specific statements that describe a consistent pattern observed in nature.
No, scientific Laws and scientific theories are not same.Scientific Laws have proofs, they are acceptable by all like Newton's Laws of motion are accepted by allwhere as scientific theories demands proofs, these are not acceptable by all Like Theory by Charles Darwin is not acceptable by all
There is replicatable data that runs counter to the laws/theories.
In the scientific context, theories and laws serve different purposes. Theories are overarching explanations supported by a large body of evidence, while laws are concise statements describing natural phenomena. Theories do not "become" laws; they complement each other by providing explanations and descriptions in science.
We gotta know it by scientific laws and theories. Scientific theories are produced from the scientific method through formation and testing of hypotheses and can predict the behaviour of the natural world. They both are well supported by observations and experimental evidence. By this we can determine the whole process...Rutherford theory Corrected by Bohr ....
Laws are consistent observations and always happen Theories are attempts to explain why certain laws are true.
One way scientific theories and scientific laws are similar is that both are based on extensive observation and experimentation and are fundamental to understanding the natural world. However, they differ in that scientific laws describe consistent, universal relationships observed in nature (like the law of gravity), while scientific theories provide explanations for those observations and can encompass broader concepts (like the theory of evolution).
Both scientific laws and theories are explanations of natural phenomena based on empirical evidence. They both strive to describe, predict, and explain specific aspects of the natural world. However, laws are typically concise statements that describe a relationship or pattern, while theories are more comprehensive explanations that incorporate multiple laws and hypotheses.