0
What else can I help you with?
How the prevailing theories about testing bring changes in atomic theories?
We gotta know it by scientific laws and theories. Scientific theories are produced from the scientific method through formation and testing of hypotheses and can predict the behaviour of the natural world. They both are well supported by observations and experimental evidence. By this we can determine the whole process...Rutherford theory Corrected by Bohr ....
What was a major problem with Greek Scientific theoreys?
The major problem with Greek scientific theories was that the Greeks believed that God is what made everything happen the way it did. The Greeks did not always take into account the natural laws and variables that came into play.
Why are scientific theories said to be just a theory?
People tend to say that scientific theories are "just" a theory because of a confusion between the common usage of "theory" and the scientific definition. (In everyday speech people often use the word "theory" in the sense of a "hunch" or "vague idea". This is not what the word means in a scientific context). A scientific theory is deduced from observations and is the simplest way of describing natural phenomena. It is testable, observable, predictable, and falsifiable. Scientific theories are not the same thing as hypotheses, which are explanations that haven't been demonstrated or verified. A scientific theory has evidence to back it up. The common usage of 'theory' suggests an explanation that someone hasn't proven, or isn't able to prove. It doesn't imply evidence that has been tested; it doesn't imply predictability. When someone hears, for example, "Big Bang theory" or "the theory of evolution", they may hear the word 'theory' and associate those scientific theories with someone's opinion or suggestion. In reality, these theories are the best scientific explanations for a myriad of phenomena across multiple scientific definitions. In science, "just a theory" is a very good place to be.
How is a scientific theory differ from general theory?
Scientific theories are explanations of natural phenomena based on observation and experiment. Current theories represent the best possible explanation given the most current information but are not meant to be the final explanation. The best, most reliable theories withstand the test of time and new discoveries, such as the Einstein's theory of general relativity or Darwin's theory of evolution. New discoveries may add to the detail of these theories or confirm their reliability in describing the phenomenal world, but no discovery so far has shown either of these theories to be false. The best theories also lead to testable predictions which either confirm or falsify the validity of the theory.General theory, or theory as used in every day language, more often describes a guess or conjecture and is closer to the scientific idea of a hypothesis.
What is a result for Generalizations explanations of natural phenomena and additional hypotheses?
Generalizations in the explanation of natural phenomena allow for the formulation of broader theories that can predict and explain various observations. These generalizations often lead to additional hypotheses that can be tested through experimentation and observation. This iterative process strengthens scientific understanding by refining theories and expanding knowledge. Ultimately, it enhances our ability to make sense of complex natural systems and informs further inquiry.
Is it true thatLearning about the natural world starts with memorizing scientific laws and theories?
It doesn't have to.
Is it true that Learning about the natural world starts with memorizing scientific laws and theories?
No! I would think that is the single worst way to start learning about the natural world. The way to start is to foster curiosity. Memorizing laws and theories kills curiosity faster than heat kills Frosty. Being curious about something, then observing patterns in it, and then seeing that patterns can be formulated into ideas-- now that's not so bad.
How are scientific law and scientific theory are the same?
Scientific laws and scientific theories are both established principles in science that explain natural phenomena. Laws describe empirical observations and relationships, while theories provide explanations for why and how those observations occur. Both are fundamental to our understanding of the natural world and are supported by empirical evidence.
How the prevailing theories about testing bring changes in atomic theories?
We gotta know it by scientific laws and theories. Scientific theories are produced from the scientific method through formation and testing of hypotheses and can predict the behaviour of the natural world. They both are well supported by observations and experimental evidence. By this we can determine the whole process...Rutherford theory Corrected by Bohr ....
Why does scientific evidence support scientific theories?
Scientific evidence supports scientific theories through empirical observations, experiments, and data analysis that consistently confirm the predictions and explanations of the theories. Theories are continuously tested and revised based on new evidence, leading to a more refined and accurate understanding of the natural world. Overall, the robustness and validity of scientific theories are demonstrated through the process of evidence accumulation and verification by multiple independent researchers.
What is an organized way of learning about the natural world?
scienceThis would be the scientific method.
Can scientific theories be rejected?
Yes, scientific theories can be rejected if new evidence emerges that contradicts them or if they are no longer able to explain observed phenomena. The process of science involves testing and refining theories based on experimental results and observations, and theories can be revised or replaced as our understanding of the natural world evolves.
What is the main similarity between scientific theories and scientific laws?
The main similarity between scientific theories and scientific laws is that both are supported by extensive evidence and are used to explain natural phenomena. However, theories are broader explanations that can be modified or refined based on new evidence, while laws are specific statements that describe a consistent pattern observed in nature.
Which comes first theories or scientific laws?
Scientific theories usually come before scientific laws. Theories are comprehensive explanations of a wide range of observations and data, while laws are concise statements describing specific relationships or patterns within a system. Theories often precede the formulation of laws as they help to understand and predict natural phenomena before they can be distilled into succinct laws.
What is a method of learning about the natural world and the body of knowledge gained through that process?
scientific method
How did people learn about the natural world after the scientific revolution?
They read the works of the great scientists of the scientific revolution. They used observations, facts, experiments, and theories about how nature worked.
How was the first theory formed?
The earliest scientific theories were formed through observations, experimentation, and reasoning by early philosophers such as Aristotle and Ptolemy in ancient Greece. They sought to explain natural phenomena based on what they could observe in the world around them. These initial theories laid the foundation for the development of modern scientific theories.
