They are not the same, theory is just that, it may be provable in some instances, but cannot be positivity applied to all cases, law however can. Their similarity is that they both require some proof, but law needs to be proven to be true for all cases.
False. A scientific theory and a scientific law are not the same thing. A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of an aspect of the natural world, based on extensive evidence and experimentation, while a scientific law is a statement that describes a consistent and observable phenomenon, often expressed mathematically. Theories can evolve and change with new evidence, whereas laws are generally accepted as universally applicable under specific conditions.
Since it is called "the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle" it is neither a scientific law nor a theory. It is a principle.
A scientific law is a law that should be taken to be universally applicable. It attempts to describe an observation in nature and applies to all of the different sciences.A scientific law is a theory that has been tested and is believed to be true. Laws are usually used in Physics, whereas in Biology and Chemistry, the same definition is used to describe a scientific theory.Hence,The law of gravityThe theory of evolutionBoth are considered to be true in equal amounts, it's just a difference in terminology.A scientific law i just simply a "law" that has to do with science. For example, gravity. A scientific law is a pattern found in nature! A scientific law is a statement based on repeated experimental observations that describes some aspect of the universe. A scientific law always applies under the same conditions, and implies that there is a causal relationship involving its elements.Scientific laws describe things that happen the same way every time.
In science, "theory" is the name applied to well-established scientific knowledge. It doesn't mean that there are doubts about the atomic theory.
A scientic law is universal and it formed after various tried and tested experiments .We also know its limtations and conditions .it cannot be changed .Example , Mendels law , newtons law of gravitation etc whereas theory generalise the constant results of experiments , theories can be improved and changed .example Darwin's theory of evolution On the other hand ,law cant be changed.
A scientific theory is not the same as a scientific law because a law is already proved and used but theories can be changed by other scientists is the view of a 13 year old girl.
A scientific theory is not the same as a scientific law because a law is already proved and used but theories can be changed by other scientists is the view of a 13 year old girl.
They're the same thing, but (usually) the "law" has an equation associated with it, while the "theory" is just a (verbal) discription.
A scientific theory is an explanation of some natural phenomenon. A scientific law is a succinct statement of some aspect of a scientific theory.
A scientific theory is an explanation of some natural phenomenon. A scientific law is a succinct statement of some aspect of a scientific theory.
Scientific theory is a well supported by evidence set of principles that explain and predict natural phenomenon. A scientific law explains what some phenomenon does scientifically and under the same conditions.
Scientific theory is a well supported by evidence set of principles that explain and predict natural phenomenon. A scientific law explains what some phenomenon does scientifically and under the same conditions.
scientific law is unlike a scientific theory in a sense that its the next step above a scientific theory.A scientific law is one that has been proven, a scientific theory has not been proven yet.
A theory, when proven over time, can become a law. Example: Law of Gravity and Theory of Evolution
a theory is explaining how something works, is made or happens and a law is what you can and cant do.
A theory explains how something works - a "law" is just a thumb nail description of a theory.
no