Laws have been proven, theories have not
Theories are explanations that describe and interpret a phenomenon, often based on evidence and observations. Laws, on the other hand, are principles that describe patterns in nature, usually expressed as mathematical equations or statements. Theories aim to explain why something happens, while laws describe what happens.
One key difference is the homestead exemption amount, which is unlimited in Florida but capped in California. Another difference is the types of property that can be exempt from creditors, with Florida offering more protection for assets like life insurance policies and annuities. Additionally, the income thresholds for qualifying for Chapter 7 bankruptcy may vary between the two states.
It doesn't have to.
Scientific theories and laws technically are never true. They are models that scientists create in order to predict outcomes. Since nature has given us no essential axioms everything scientists have done is just a model. For example: When maxwell originally developed his theory he used a set of cogs and wheels to explain electromagnetism. He later realized these were not necessary and dropped them from his formulation. This changes the essence of his theory but both ways delivered the same predictions given a set of data points. Similarly, before Einstein, newtons laws were considered infallable however later we realized that newton's laws only work in certain realms. Even Einstein didn't have the whole story. Dirac later applied his relativistic theories to the quantum field. Currently dirac's theory has the largest realm of applicablity (although it is very difficult to use). However even dirac's theory cannot explain all realms. Therefore theories and laws, since they are not essential to nature and are just models and can be replaced.
Planetary scientists still aren't sure. I'll let someone else go into the theories if they want to do that.
Laws have been proven, theories have not
law is based on fact theory is a concept/idea
A scientific theory become a law when it is widely recognized and accepted by the scientific community in the epoch.
Laws exist in nature and can be discovered. Theories are attempts to explain something (such as the behavior of something in a specific situation) Hypotheses are suggestions which hopefully can be tested and if proved correct could become theory.
The difference between models and theories is nothing hahahahahaha loser go look in your book
what are the difference between relevance and irrelevance theories of dividends
Laws are part of theories. The theory is an overall explanation of some phenomenon, and if there is a law that is part of that theory, it is a key idea or a summation of the overall theory. Scientific laws are usually in the form of a mathematical equation, although they can also be succinct statements in normal language, such as the law of survival of the fittest, which is part of the theory of evolution.
all theories don't become laws
grand theory originated in psychology while emergent theories focus on nurture.
Theories are explanations that describe and interpret a phenomenon, often based on evidence and observations. Laws, on the other hand, are principles that describe patterns in nature, usually expressed as mathematical equations or statements. Theories aim to explain why something happens, while laws describe what happens.
The main similarity between scientific theories and scientific laws is that both are supported by extensive evidence and are used to explain natural phenomena. However, theories are broader explanations that can be modified or refined based on new evidence, while laws are specific statements that describe a consistent pattern observed in nature.
There is replicatable data that runs counter to the laws/theories.