Laws exist in nature and can be discovered.
Theories are attempts to explain something (such as the behavior of something in a specific situation)
Hypotheses are suggestions which hopefully can be tested and if proved correct could become theory.
The difference between models and theories is nothing hahahahahaha loser go look in your book
what are the difference between relevance and irrelevance theories of dividends
grand theory originated in psychology while emergent theories focus on nurture.
The major difference between political theories lies in their beliefs about the role of government in society. Some theories advocate for a strong, centralized government that provides for the needs of its citizens, while others argue for limited government involvement and emphasize individual freedoms and rights.
law is based on fact theory is a concept/idea
Laws have been proven, theories have not
SEAS
Supposedly, yes. The ones that don't, should.
Evolution is the process by which species change over time through natural selection. Theories of evolution, such as Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection, are explanations for how evolution occurs and the mechanisms driving it. In essence, evolution is the phenomenon, while theories of evolution are the explanations for how it happens.
A scientific theory become a law when it is widely recognized and accepted by the scientific community in the epoch.
Laws describe observed phenomena and relationships in nature, while theories explain why those phenomena occur based on tested hypotheses and evidence. Laws are more descriptive and specific, while theories are broader and provide a framework for understanding natural phenomena.
Descriptive theories aim to describe and explain how things are, based on observation and data. Prescriptive theories, on the other hand, provide recommendations or guidelines on how things should be or how people should act, based on values or norms.