That's entirely a matter of perspective. From a perspective favouring robustness, one might say that natural selection is good because it usually favours the robustness of both individual populations and their ecologies. It allows survival of the fittest. But from a perspective of individual rights, one might say that natural selection is bad because it can deny individuals the right to happiness, reproduction or even life.
Its NaTuRaL sElEcTiOn if you didn't know.
It's apt enough.
Adaptation does not allow for natural selection: natural selection causes adaptation.
The prefix of natural selection is "natural" and the suffix is "-tion".
Genetic variation in itself does not 'support' natural selection: it is what natural selection acts upon.
Natural selection doesn't reduce variation. Variation is regulated by the rate of mutation.Natural selection reduces the chance of bad variation from being passed on and increases the chances for good variation to be passed on.
Natural Selection
Natural selection.
Natural selection
That selection was natural.
No, natural selection is the mechanism that drivesevolution.
Natural selection is what causes adaptation.