answersLogoWhite

0

Destruction of free-running rivers and their ecosystems

User Avatar

Ambrose Krajcik

Lvl 13
3y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What is the greatest environmental cost of hydroelectric power?

The greatest environmental cost of hydroelectric power is the disruption and alteration of natural river ecosystems caused by dam construction. This can lead to habitat loss, altered water flow patterns, and impacts on fish migration. Impoundment behind dams can also result in methane emissions from decomposing organic matter.


How cost effective is hydroelectric power?

very


Is it a better option to produce electricity as compared to hydroelectric power stations?

Hydroelectric power stations certainly have their advantages and disadvantages, as do all forms of electrical generation. Probably the best solution is to use a combination of different means of producing electricity, with hydroelectric stations as part of the mix.


What is the cost for hydroelectric power?

The cost is the difference of thousands of families without jobs


Is it possible to use entirely green energy sources to power a city?

Yes, hydroelectric could power a city. The issue with most green energy sources is cost and inability to obtain uninterrupted power on demand. Hydroelectric does not have these limitations. It does have some negative environmental impacts, just as all energy sources do.


How much does hydroelectric power cost?

It may cos around 100 MWh


What additional piece of information would strengthen the authors argument that hydroelectric power is the most cost effective source of renewable energy?

To strengthen the argument that hydroelectric power is the most cost-effective source of renewable energy, the author could provide specific cost comparisons between hydroelectric power and other renewable sources, such as solar and wind, including initial investment, operational costs, and maintenance over time. Additionally, presenting data on long-term energy output and reliability, as well as economic benefits such as job creation and local infrastructure improvements, would further bolster the case for hydroelectric power's cost-effectiveness.


Some argue that hydroelectric power should be used to generate more of the energy for the US Which argument could be used to dispute this idea?

Expanding hydroelectric power production can have negative environmental impacts such as disrupting aquatic ecosystems, displacing communities, and altering natural river flow. In addition, the construction of new hydroelectric plants requires substantial upfront capital investment and may not be the most cost-effective or efficient solution compared to other renewable energy sources like solar or wind power.


Is using hydroelectric power expensive or cheap?

There is usually a large one off initial capital outlay, for example to build a dam. After that the electricity produced is almost zero cost You will usually be sued also, but it is too clean to turn down.


Is hydroelectric cheap or expensive?

Hydroelectric power is generally considered to be a cost-effective energy source in the long term due to low operational and maintenance costs once the infrastructure is established. However, the initial capital investment for building dams and plants can be high. Additionally, economic viability can be influenced by factors such as location, environmental impacts, and regulatory challenges. Overall, while upfront costs may be significant, hydroelectric power often results in cheaper electricity over time.


What has the author Linda Lorraine May written?

Linda Lorraine May has written: 'Economic and environmental trade-offs in Washington small-scale hydropower evaluation' -- subject(s): Cost effectiveness, Environmental aspects, Environmental aspects of Water resources development, Hydroelectric power plants, United States, United States. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Water resources development


What is one drawback to hydroelectric?

The major hurdle associated with hydro power is to ensure uniform availability of water which is not possible as water availability is gioverened by nature. The huge capital cost ( almost three to four times than thermal power) is another drawback yielda higher unit rate of production.