Want this question answered?
In my opinion Killzone 3 is better than Crysis 2 because crysis doesn't have that much of sense to the story and the gameplay isn't that good either. On the other hand, killzone 3 has a better gameplay, better graphics and an EXCELLENT POINT to the story.
Not necessarilly, my pc has an intel core i5 650 cpu, ati radeon hd5770 graphics card and 4 gigabites of ddr3 memory. Crysis runs fairly well on it, take note that Crysis Warhead has better performance than Crysis because of cryengine 2.
Nope. The graphics are simply too advanced for it to run.
To be fair: Yes but I wouldn't go around boasting that you can run MW3 and MW2 at max settings because they aren't very demanding. However tyur processor will handle it with ease and you may need to set a larger page file for your RAM. Crysis 2 is nothing like Crysis 1 Crysis was brilliant, completely unformatted graphics and was a revolution in PC graphics, Crysis 2 is better suited to today's systems.
yeah it does i have intel hd graphics it made lag a little bit. but it will work
crysis 2
No it does not. The only reason it was called FarCry 2 was to increase sales because of the success of their first two games.
i doubt it unless you got a good graphics card and you need at least a i5
there are 3.. crysis crysis warhead crysis 2
Crysis 2 exist and is in development at Crytek. The entire story of Crysis 2 is fictional.
yes
Yes it is so much better I enjoyed it a lot more than Far Cry 2.