0
Kepler's Laws of Planetary Motion:
1] Each planet moves in an elliptical orbit with the sun at one focus
2] The line form the sun to any planet sweeps out equal areas of space in equal time intervals
3] The squares of the times of revolution (days, months or years) of the planets are proportional to the cubes of their average distances from the sun.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoKepler's third
law is:
The square of the period of revolution of the planet around the sun is directly proportional to the cube of the mean distance of the planet right from the sun
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoKepler's third law of planetary motion states that the square of the orbit time is proportional to the cube of the semi major axis.
Wiki User
∙ 9y agoVery well, Thank you. Now, how is the third law what, exactly?
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Which statement correctly states Keplers Third Law of Planetary Motion?
Kepler's laws cannot be proven. They are empirical laws not derived from axioms.The answer above is nonsense.Yes Kepler could not prove his laws and had only derived them empirically. But after Newton formulated his Universal law of gravitation, Kepler's laws could and have been proven.The working is quite cumbersome and cannot be repeated in this forum. But if you Google "Keplers Laws Proof" or similar you will find numerous explanations. But be prepared that complete proofs require quite some math skills. To do it rigorously you need Calculus and Vector Algebra.In essence, the first two laws are equivalent to the law of conservation of Angular Momentum (which is the cross product of the position and velocity vectors). The third law calculates the orbital period as a function of semi-major axis of the ellipse and the central mass, basically defining elliptic motion.It is amazing that Kepler was able to formulate these laws empirically (mainly by studying the motion of Mars) without having the physics and mathematics he would have needed, at his disposal.
In science a statement about how things work in nature?
Which statement is true of all scientific laws
which phrase describes a scientific law?
A statement that matter cannot be created or destroyed.
What is newtons Third law of motion is also known as action?
action
A scientific statement that can never be changed is a scientific?
law
Which of Keplers laws is also known as the Harmonic Law?
It is the third law
What is the statement for every action there is an equal but opposite reaction is a statement of?
this is the statement of newton's third law.
Which law of motion For every action there is an opposite but equal reaction?
That is basically a popular statement of Newton's Third Law.
Does Keplers third law fit each of the planets?
Technically it doesn't precisely fit any of them, but to a first approximation it fits not only each of the planets, but every other orbiting body everywhere.
How do you use the law of syllogism?
The law of syllogism is a logical rule that lets you draw a conclusion from two conditional statements. If the first statement leads to the second statement and the second statement leads to a third statement, you can infer that the first statement leads to the third statement. It's a way to combine multiple conditional statements to draw a single conclusion.
Keplers law that describes how fast planets travel at different points in their orbits is called the law of?
This is known as Keplers 2nd Law of Planetary Motion. It states that line drawn between a planet and the sun sweeps out equal areas during equal time intervals.
Which of Keplers laws says how fast planets travel at different points in their orbit?
Kepler's second law the law of equal areas.
Is an equivalent statement of Newton's third law?
For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.
How did newtons work on orbits add to work Kepler had done?
Newton derived Keplars findings from Newton's Theory of Gravity. Thus, newton 'explained' the basis for Keplars findings and extended them.
What kind of orbit would neptune have according to Keplers harmonic law?
Kepler's first law says Neptune has an elliptical orbit with the Sun at one focus. The same goes for the other planets.
Which statement correctly states Keplers Third Law of Planetary Motion?
Kepler's laws cannot be proven. They are empirical laws not derived from axioms.The answer above is nonsense.Yes Kepler could not prove his laws and had only derived them empirically. But after Newton formulated his Universal law of gravitation, Kepler's laws could and have been proven.The working is quite cumbersome and cannot be repeated in this forum. But if you Google "Keplers Laws Proof" or similar you will find numerous explanations. But be prepared that complete proofs require quite some math skills. To do it rigorously you need Calculus and Vector Algebra.In essence, the first two laws are equivalent to the law of conservation of Angular Momentum (which is the cross product of the position and velocity vectors). The third law calculates the orbital period as a function of semi-major axis of the ellipse and the central mass, basically defining elliptic motion.It is amazing that Kepler was able to formulate these laws empirically (mainly by studying the motion of Mars) without having the physics and mathematics he would have needed, at his disposal.
According to Keplers second law Pluto will be travelling fastest around the sun when?
... when it is closest to the Sun. (Kepler's Second Law)... when it is closest to the Sun. (Kepler's Second Law)... when it is closest to the Sun. (Kepler's Second Law)... when it is closest to the Sun. (Kepler's Second Law)
