0
Most likely, a misspelling of loquitur, which means "he/she/it speaks" in Latin, as in Res ipsa loquitur - a legal term meaning the thing itself speaks or that the thing or circumstance itself is obvious and requires no further proof. If you drop a barrel of flour onto someone from a second story window and he dies, his family doesn't have to further prove that your barrel and therefore your negligence killed him ( the original case was just such a claim)
What else can I help you with?
What is the definition of Loquitor?
He/She speaks as a stage direction.
What are the ratings and certificates for The Practice - 1997 Race Ipsa Loquitor 4-15?
The Practice - 1997 Race Ipsa Loquitor 4-15 is rated/received certificates of: Netherlands:12
What is the legal term meaning the thing speaks for itself?
res ipso loquitor
What are the release dates for The Practice - 1997 Race Ipsa Loquitor 4-15?
The Practice - 1997 Race Ipsa Loquitor 4-15 was released on: USA: 20 February 2000 Hungary: 23 July 2010
If a child is a risk for abuse or neglect which is likely to be invoked by the state?
res ipsa loquitor
What is res ispa loquitor?
It should be "loquitur." This phrase means "the thing speaks for itself."
Is there an analog to res ipsa loquitor in Continental Law?
In Continental law, the concept similar to res ipsa loquitor is known as "onus probandi" or "inversed burden of proof." This principle shifts the burden of proof to the defendant when certain facts are established, implying negligence or fault. However, the application and scope of this concept may vary among different Continental legal systems.
Does the doctrine of Res Ipsa Loquitor apply to all health care professionals or only the physicians?
Res Ipsa Loquitor applies to any situation in which there is only one way something could have happened. While it is relatively common in medical mal-practice, it can also be applied in many negligence cases.
What is the term resiposoloquitor?
Res ipso loquitor = "the thing speaks for itself"For example, to sue a doctor for malpractice, they have to have done worse than be wrong or make a mistake - the law recognizes a doctor is not infallible - they must be clearly negligent and provide substandard care. So if you hire a surgeon to take out your inflamed appendix, you still have stomach pain after the operation, and an X-ray shows a scalpel left behind, the scalpel is res ipso loquitor of negligence; there is no legitimate reason for a scalpel to be left behind in a patient.
Which is better 'prima facie' or 'res ipsa loquitor' for inland disputes?
Res ipsa loquitur (the thing speaks for itself), a doctrine in tort law, can establish a prima facie (evidence that sustains a judgment in the absence of contradictory evidence) case. It is not clear what you are asking in your question about "inland disputes" (definition?).
When going to court is the burden of proof lay on the plaintiff or the defendant?
The burden usually lies on the plaintiff to prove the elements of their case. However, there is the principal of res ipsa loquitor, which flips the table and requires the defendant to prove they were not negligent.
What is 'in res loquitor' and what does it do?
This is very likely a misquotation of the common Latin phrase (originally spoken by Cicero), res ipsa loquitur, "the matter itself speaks" (usually translated "the thing speaks for itself"). It is used in common law to mean that the nature of an accident can be sufficient evidence of negligence all by itself, even without independent evidence concerning the defendant's behavior.
