Primary source of information is the form of research or data that is gathered from a direct source, e.g. direct interviews. Data gathered from a newspaper is not considered as a primary source of information.
It is important to identify the motive and context of a primary source document because they help further explain the story. The motive identifies the cause and effect of the document and the context further backs up the motive.
perspective :)
perspective :)
First one is a primary source, because it's from their "Primary View" second one is a secondary source, since they didn't see it in their Primary View, it was told to them. So the answer for apex is (A) primary source; (B) secondary source
(A) primary source; (B) secondary source
what is a primary document of spain
well, primary source is when you find something, by not using any evidence the man was reading a newspaper. secondary is when you find information from the primary source. the man found a newspaper add for a gardener. . . sorry it hard to explain xxx or...
A primary source is a firsthand account or original work created at the time of the event being studied. A secondary source is an interpretation or analysis of primary sources, often produced after the event by someone who did not directly experience it.
To analyze the context of a primary source document, you should consider the author's background, intention, audience, and the historical events or circumstances surrounding its creation. It is important to examine the document within its historical, social, and cultural context to fully understand its meaning and significance. Compare the information found in the document with other sources to gain a more comprehensive understanding.
Yes, a primary source can be biased because it reflects the perspective or agenda of the individual who created it. It's important to consider the potential biases of a primary source when analyzing and interpreting its information.
all of the above