0
What is one reason withholding information the narrator gives is sometimes more intelligent?
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
As an omniscient or semi-omniscient being or voice that merely relates the story to the audience, the narrator already KNOWS details of the story--since the narrator is the writer, whether the writer uses 1st, 2nd, or 3rd person voice. So I, as narrator-writer, might already know in the plot that a "good girl" character has a dark past in which she murdered her parents. But I, as writer-narrator, can withhold that information from the audience, or leave subtle hints about some (unnamed) event or circumstance in her story. The narrator's knowledge does NOT need to be dumped all at one time onto the pages. Withholding sets aside the narrator's knowledge (intelligence) in order to create surprise, suspense, and garner reader's interest in figuring out the plot.
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
Withholding information can create suspense and engage the audience by prompting them to think more deeply and analytically about the story. It can also help maintain an element of surprise or enable the narrator to control the flow of information for maximum impact.
Wiki User
∙ 7y agoWithholding information from the reader is sometimes more useful because you don't want the reader to figure everything out too quickly and be bored. You want some mystery in the story to keep them interested.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How would you describe the narrator of love is a fallacy?
intelligent
Is Odysseus a reliable or unreliable narrator?
Odysseus is typically considered an unreliable narrator in Greek mythology. He is known for his cunning and ability to manipulate situations to his advantage, often stretching the truth or withholding information when telling his stories. His reputation as a master of deception makes it difficult to trust all the details he provides.
Why is a first person narrator sometimes problematic?
The first person narrator can only narrate what he or she knows. You see the story from their viewpoint.
How is an objective narrator different from an unreliable narrator?
An objective narrator presents information without bias or personal feelings, allowing readers to form their own opinions. In contrast, an unreliable narrator may distort or manipulate information, casting doubt on the accuracy of the story being told.
How does the setting affect the narrator?
It might not. Sometimes the setting is integral to the story - the narrator is going to act differently depending on where and when the story is set. But sometimes the setting is just a backdrop, and the story can take place anywhere and anywhen.
How old do you think the narrator is?
It is difficult to determine the age of the narrator without more context or information about the content being discussed.
The information provided by the narrator you get the impression the narrator is?
The impression of the narrator can vary based on their tone, word choice, and perspective. It could suggest they are reliable, biased, objective, emotional, distant, or involved, depending on how they present the information and their attitude towards the subject matter.
Who is the I' or the narrator in the selection?
The narrator in a selection refers to the person telling the story or sharing information. The "I" or narrator can differ depending on the context of the text, but it is typically the point of view from which the story is being told.
Does the repeated claim establish the narrator as a reliable source of information?
Not necessarily. While repetition can reinforce a point, the reliability of a narrator is determined by other factors such as evidence, credibility, consistency, and objectivity in presenting information.
What can you infer about the narrator from this passage of The War of the Worlds?
The narrator in The War of the Worlds seems observant, curious, and detail-oriented based on the passage. They pay close attention to their surroundings and are reflective in their observations of the Martian arrival. The tone suggests a mix of fear, wonder, and a desire to understand the unfolding events.
Is the omniscient narrator required to tell the truth?
Yes, the omniscient narrator is expected to tell the truth in a story. This narrator is all-knowing and presents information objectively, providing insight into characters and events from a neutral perspective. Misleading information would compromise the narrator's reliability and the overall credibility of the story.
How does a reader determine if a narrator is credible based on consistency of information?
A reader can determine if a narrator is credible by assessing the consistency of information shared throughout the narrative. If the details, plot points, and character behaviors remain coherent and logical without contradicting each other, the narrator is likely credible. Inconsistencies or discrepancies in the storytelling can raise doubts about the narrator's reliability.
