They are similar to shoulder fired rockets.
No, rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs) are not considered a type of air ordnance. RPGs are portable, shoulder-fired weapons that use a rocket motor to propel a grenade toward a target, typically used in ground combat. Air ordnance refers to munitions specifically designed to be deployed from aircraft. Therefore, while both involve explosives, they serve different purposes and are classified differently.
A. They are similar to shoulder-fired rockets B. It stands for Rocket Propelled Grenade or Role Playing Game
Bazookas and rocket-propelled grenades, or RPGs are both known as tankbuster weapons. The bazooka was developed by the United States military and the RPG was developed by the Soviet Union. The main difference between these two weapons is how they deliver their payload. In the bazooka, the payload is stored in the rear chamber, while in the RPG the payload is in the front. Also, the exhaust of the bazooka is in the rear while the RPG traps and later dissapates exhaust into the chaimber.
No. An RPG is a hand held shoulder launched anti-tank weapon.
It depends on the seller. RPGs cost around $3,000 in some areas. It also depends on the area if it is in a conflict or struggle. Prices will go high in war infested areas. If you are going to buy a RPG, good luck to smuggle it back in the United States.
Are RPGs easily confused with CBUs?
bow and arrow knife's spears an atlatl for throwing the spears clubs and sickles curved blades for cutting grass but were also used for battle.
Yes shoulder-fired rockets ARE RPGs. But only the US M-72 66mm (Vietnam War) LAW (Light Anti-Tank) rocket launcher was the US counter-part to the NVA's RPG (Rocket Propelled Grenade-Launcher). If you compared the Viet War era LAW rocket (when removed from the fiber glass tube) it was nearly identical to the communist RPG rocket. Today's medium anti-tank rockets; Dragons, and optical and wire guided shoulder fired rockets are NOT similar to the old style RPG launchers. Both the LAW and Vietnam era RPG were just about equal (they even made the same sized hole in a tank); both were free firing with NO wires nor optics nor computers; they both had an enormous back blast and about the same range. The only real difference, was the communists could re-load their launchers, US LAWs were expendable, "one shot/then destroy the tube" (throw away).
In Battlefield 3, the RPG-7V2 is an unguided anti-vehicle weapon. It is used by the Russian forces in multiplayer, and is the counterpart to the SMAW. It is not an AT gun per se, but is in fact a rocket.
bakuganlegends.webs.com
92%
No ... math-skills can help in RPGs that involve a lot of number crunching, but most RPGs have options in place, like auto-leveling and things that help you have fun without having to compute numbers. I would stay away from hardcore Dungeons and Dragons games, like the Neverwinter Nights series. Those games have a steep learning curve, especially if you aren't familiar with D&D game mechanics. But there many kinds of RPGs out there, it's a very versatile genre. You want to look at hack & slash action RPGs, or Japanese-style RPGs (like the Dragon Quest or Final Fantasy series), or even puzzle RPGs like Puzzle Quest.