Not necessarily the same.
Theft is the ACT of stealing something.
Possession is the act of having it on your person, or within your control.
Not necessarily, as long as enough credible evidence can be presented to prove that you stole it, or had it in your possession after the theft.
In our area Retail theft, curfew violation, and Minor in Possession (MIP) are the most often charged. MIC Minor in consumption is a frequent charge but the possession charge along with retail theft and curfew violation are the most common.
The definition of theft can vary slightly between jurisdictions - "taking possession" is an element, but it doesn't technically matter for how long - you can be charged with theft if you take possession of anything valuable with the intent to exclude the owner's interest, even if its momentary and they regain possession. People report incidents to law enforcement, and law enforcement/prosecutor's office files charges when applicable. If a person has any financial loss due to an attempted theft, they can certainly file a civil suit for damages.
Theft is stealing something from a person or place without their consent. Borrow is when the owner of an object or item loans it to you and is in full knowledge that it is in your possession.
I have been a victim of identity theft. My credit card was used to make a purchase on the Internet while the card was still in my possession.
The principal distinction between the two crimes is that in theft the thing is taken while in estafa the accused receives the property and converts it to his own use or benefit.However, there may be theft even if the accused has possession of the property. If he was entrusted only with the material or physical (natural) or de factopossession of the thing, his misappropriation of the same constitutes theft, but if he has the juridical possession of the thing, his conversion of the same constitutes embezzlement or estafa. ("Juridical possession" means a possession which gives the transferee a right over the thing which the transferee may set up even against the owner.)A sum of money received by an employee in behalf of an employer is considered to be only in the material possession of the employee.NOTE: This answer is based on Philippine law and jurisprudence.
Yes. Possession of stolen property is a lesser included charge to most theft or burglary crimes. YOushould also remember that prosecution is not conviction.
Stealing a purse would typically be classified as theft or larceny, which involves unlawfully taking someone else's property without permission with the intent to permanently deprive them of it. The specific charge and severity would depend on the value of the purse and any additional circumstances.
Kansas Statutes Annotated 21-3701 defines theft. One of the subsets of theft is possessing property known to have been stolen by another person. Whether the crime is misdie or felony depends on the value of the property. In Kansas, the person who actually stole the property is NOT chargeable with its possession--it has to have been stolen by one person and possessed by another.
I'll take an educated GUESS: It sounds like court 'shorthand/abbreviations' taken off of a criminal case file jacket; Two counts of theft & Possession of a Controlled Substance with the Intent to Distribute
A charge of theft control intent is a shortened version of possession of stolen property with intent to sell. This means that a person was caught red-handed with a stolen item and there is evidence to believe that the person was trying to sell it.
It depends on the state.First, there is a statute of limitations on the crime of stealing the weapon. The fact that the firearm was stolen may not be subject to the Statute of Limitations. So anyone that comes in possession of the weapon is in effect, committing a new crime.Second, LA has a law that reads "Knows or should have known that the firearm was the subject of a robbery or theft." That someone "should have know" a certain weopon was stolen might be a tough sell, it doesn't mean that an individual is immune to being charged.Another View: The question is unclear on whether the gun theft happened 30 years ago or the possession offense took place 30 years ago.If the gun theft occurred thirty years ago, but the gun was just now found in this person's possession, then it is a fresh crime and a fresh charge.It makes no difference how long ago the gun was stolen. The theft may be 30 years old, but the possession is occurring in present time - now.