because jesus did on the cross :)
Because evolution is a proven, testable, scientific theory.
There is no correlation between the two.
China the middle east places where oppression is prominent
timetravel has multiple theories about how it could work but none of them have been proven yet.
All citizens were innocent unless proven guilty.
You cannot prove that Christianity is the true relligion, this has to be proven by the individual.The teachings of Christianity are only true in so far as the original records have been translated correctly. Read James 1:5-6. By doing as James suggests you will know the truth.
Although proven difficult to climb, Benito Mussolini became a ladder just before he became a dictatorial leader of Italy.
yes as a matter of fact she was. Though rumors flocked in large numbers that the princess had survived the massacre of her family all were proven false. The most convincing "Anestassia's" remains were salvaged and were proven to have no relation to the Romanov's
Yes, it has been proven as valid. Many historians and scholars have researched the validity and accuracy of the story of Gallipoli and it remains true.
A:What can bring Judaism, Christianity and Islam together can already be found in China. Leaders of the two great Chinese religions, Buddhism and Taoism, teach what is believed, but each faith accepts that the other religion believes differently and does not claim that the other is wrong. This is the way forward if Judaism, Christianity and Islam are to be brought together. Followers of each religion must accept that what others believed can not be proven wrong, just as what they themselves believe can not be proven true. This brings about the humility that all the great religions preach, but seldom achieve.
Few herbal remedies have been conclusively proven to work, which is why herbalism remains classed as 'alternative medicine'.
Scientists refrain from declaring a theory as "proven" because scientific knowledge is inherently provisional and subject to change with new evidence. A theory is considered robust when it consistently explains and predicts phenomena, but it remains open to revision or rejection if new data contradicts it. This approach ensures that science remains a dynamic process, fostering continual inquiry and refinement rather than definitive conclusions.