Rationing is the controlled distribution of resources and scarce goods or services: it restricts how much people are allowed to buy or consume. Rationing controls the size of the ration, one's allotted portion of the resources being distributed on a particular day or at a particular time. Rationing has long been used in the military, especially the navy, to make supplies last for a defined duration, such as a voyage. To ration the supplies, they are divided up into equal portions for each person for each day, or even a meal, over the expected voyage period. The objective is to ensure that each person receives a fair share of supplies throughout the voyage. Often some reserve were also held. If supplies ran short or the voyage went longer than expected, the ration portions would be reduced. For example, half rations means the portions are cut in half, making the supplies last twice as long.
Rationing is the government's restriction on the amounts of a specific item that can be purchased by a consumer. This is usually caused by a shortage of the item or commodity. An enforcement system usually includes the use of ration coupons or ration books. A family or person would be given these coupons or books to use over a certain period of time. For example: If the government issued you 10 coffee coupons per month; and each coupon allowed you to purchase one pound of coffee. Each time you bought one pound of coffee at the store, the store would take your money and one of your coupons. If you used up all your "coffee" coupons, then a store could not sell you coffee until you were issued more coupons.
You can just apologize , without qualifiers or rationalizations , and ask for forgiveness.
CHRIS ARGYRIS has written: 'REASONS AND RATIONALIZATIONS: THE LIMITS TO ORGANIZATIONAL KNOWLEDGE'
Moral immunity refers to the psychological and social mechanisms that protect individuals or groups from feeling guilt or moral responsibility for unethical actions. This concept often involves rationalizations, justifications, or social norms that allow people to disengage from moral standards, enabling them to act in ways that contradict their ethical beliefs without experiencing internal conflict. It can be seen in various contexts, such as in organizations, where collective rationalizations can shield members from accountability for harmful behaviors. Ultimately, moral immunity can lead to a lack of empathy and awareness of the consequences of one's actions.
Some are, but indictment is uncommon.In the US, a culture of "cops and perps" has been allowed to develop and grow. This Us or Them paradigm has been examined in depth by psychologist and Stanford University professor Phillip Zimbardo since his groundbreaking failure entitled The Stanford Prison Experiment. Zimbardo identified accurately that cops, in this case simulated prison guards, are inclined to protect their peers while torturing their charges. This "covering" behavior often extends to rationalizations of illegal behavior. The rationalizations are generally why law enforcement officers are not often indicted for criminal acts. At least one reason.
Obviously, this could be menopause, which would mean your menstrual cycle is coming to an end and you will not be able to have any more children. However, two months isn't something very alarming. I would wait a couple more months until I start making rationalizations.
Mollification, a critical thinking error, refers to the tendency to downplay or ignore evidence that contradicts one's beliefs or opinions in order to maintain comfort or avoid cognitive dissonance. This can hinder objective evaluation of information and lead to biased reasoning. It is important to be aware of this tendency and actively seek out and consider alternative perspectives and information.
Charybdis is a sea monster from Greek mythology who was believed to live in a whirlpool in the Strait of Messina, a narrow waterway between Italy and Sicily. According to the legend, she swallowed huge amounts of water three times a day, creating a deadly whirlpool that endangered passing ships.
People may feel incest is okay due to various cultural, psychological, or personal beliefs. In some societies, close familial bonds can lead to a normalization of such relationships, often justified by notions of love or connection. Additionally, individuals may struggle with societal norms or personal desires, leading to rationalizations of behavior that would typically be deemed taboo. Ultimately, these feelings can stem from a complex interplay of individual circumstances, upbringing, and societal influences.
Many people in the past viewed the slave trade as acceptable due to a combination of economic interests, racial beliefs, and social norms. The demand for labor in plantations and industries made slavery an economically profitable enterprise, particularly in the Americas. Additionally, prevailing racial ideologies dehumanized enslaved individuals, portraying them as inferior and justifying their subjugation. This mindset was reinforced by cultural and religious rationalizations that framed slavery as a natural or even beneficial institution.
Uh, I want an abortion because I don't want to be pregnant anymore. How about, I have a serious disease that is certain to be passed on to my baby and I won't do that. The tests show that the baby will be born with Down's syndrome or (any number of horrible disorders), and I don't want to do that. Actually those are more rationalizations/good reasons to have an abortion. Beyond that, I don't know.
When kids are able to choose their own clothes to wear, it helps them to express their preferences and individuality. It is also good practice for appropriate dress decision making when they are older. However, if the T-shirt is required dress, it is critical to recognize that a huge element of schooling is socialization, and the critical element of socialization is learning to follow rules. If you wish to individualize, do so within the established system. If you disagree with the system, work to change it rather than searching for rationalizations for petulant behavior.
ELEVEN questions SEVEN closely about his motives to understand the underlying biases and rationalizations behind SEVEN's opinions, particularly since they differ significantly from his own. ELEVEN is deeply invested in the pursuit of justice and truth, which is why he is drawn to "12 Angry Men," a film that explores themes of moral responsibility, the complexities of human nature, and the importance of critical thinking in the face of prejudice. By engaging SEVEN, ELEVEN seeks to challenge assumptions and foster a more thorough examination of their case.