becasue it has been labeled as a legend it makes it more important than a story and so it has become more significant.
source- a knight in King Arthur's court
Myth,legend
the story of King Arthur was a legend. The story is not associated with a specific century.
Its a legend! You didnt know that? You dumbasses! LMFAOO!
Arthur is a LEGEND. He was not born, he is a story that grew. If there was a real Arthur, he lived some time between 400 and 800AD.
The story of King Arthur is a legend or folk tale, and has been written about in many historical novels, films and TV programmes.
a legend is a story about something that has been embellished. so i would have to say yes, because there are actual written records of king arthur
i think it is a fabel i think it is a fabel
In T.H. White's "The Once and Future King," Arthur's wife is Queen Guinevere. Their relationship is a significant aspect of the Arthurian legend.
King Arthur is not real and is a story that dates back to oral legend it was the only way to tell a story.
It's a folktale of how King Arthur became king of Britain.
A story or myth that has been passed down from person to person over many years. The validity of the story cannot be proven to be correct or not. Such as the Legend of King Arthur.
King Arthur. It's the name of King Arthur's sword.