#include<stdio.h>
#include<conio.h>
int main()
{
char p[10][5],temp[5];
int i,j,pt[10],wt[10],totwt=0,pr[10],temp1,n;
float avgwt;
clrscr();
printf("enter no of processes:");
scanf("%d",&n);
for(i=0;i<n;i++)
{
printf("enter process%d name:",i+1);
scanf("%s",&p[i]);
printf("enter process time:");
scanf("%d",&pt[i]);
printf("enter priority:");
scanf("%d",&pr[i]);
}
for(i=0;i<n-1;i++)
{
for(j=i+1;j<n;j++)
{
if(pr[i]>pr[j])
{
temp1=pr[i];
pr[i]=pr[j];
pr[j]=temp1;
temp1=pt[i];
pt[i]=pt[j];
pt[j]=temp1;
strcpy(temp,p[i]);
strcpy(p[i],p[j]);
strcpy(p[j],temp);
}
}
}
wt[0]=0;
for(i=1;i<n;i++)
{
wt[i]=wt[i-1]+et[i-1];
totwt=totwt+wt[i];
}
avgwt=(float)totwt/n;
printf("p_name\t p_time\t priority\t w_time\n");
for(i=0;i<n;i++)
{
printf(" %s\t %d\t %d\t %d\n" ,p[i],pt[i],pr[i],wt[i]);
}
printf("total waiting time=%d\n avg waiting time=%f",tot,avg);
getch();
}
#include
struct proc
{
int pid;
int at,bt,wt,tat,rbt;
int flag,flag1;
};
struct proc p1[10];
int i,j,k,n,no,m;
float atat=0.0,awt=0.0;
int tbt=0;
int minimum1();
int main()
{
int minv,locv,mins,locs;
printf("\nenter the number of processes:");
scanf("%d",&n);
printf("\nenter the proc information:");
printf("\npid at bt");
for(i=0;i { p1[i].wt=0; p1[i].tat=0; p1[i].flag=0; p1[i].flag1=0; scanf("%d%d%d",&p1[i].pid,&p1[i].at,&p1[i].bt); tbt+=p1[i].bt; p1[i].rbt=p1[i].bt; } printf("\nthe proc information:"); printf("\npid at bt"); for(i=0;i { printf("\n%d %d %d",p1[i].pid,p1[i].at,p1[i].bt); } minv=p1[0].at; locv=0; for(i=1;i { if(p1[i].at { locv=i; //tells min at process in locv minv=p1[i].at; } } for(i=0;i { if(p1[i].at==minv) { p1[i].flag1=1; //processes having same minimum at } } mins=p1[0].bt; locs=0; for(i=0;i { if(p1[i].flag1==1&&p1[i].bt { mins=p1[i].bt; //gives process with minimum burst time locs=i; } } printf("\ngantt chart:"); for(i=minv;i { for(j=0;j { if(p1[j].rbt>0&&p1[j].at<=i) { p1[j].flag=1; } } no=minimum1(); printf("%d p[%d]",i,p1[no].pid); p1[no].rbt=p1[no].rbt-1; for(k=0;k { if(p1[k].rbt>0&&p1[k].at<=i&&k!=no) { p1[k].wt++; } } } printf("%d",tbt+minv); for(i=0;i { awt+=p1[i].wt; } awt=awt/n; for(i=0;i { p1[i].tat=p1[i].wt+p1[i].bt; atat+=p1[i].tat; } atat=atat/n; printf("\n average wt=%f, average tat=%f",awt,atat); printf("\nthe proc information:"); printf("\npid at bt wt tat"); for(i=0;i { printf("\n%d %d %d %d %d",p1[i].pid,p1[i].at,p1[i].bt,p1[i].wt,p1[i].tat); } } int minimum1() { int loc,z; int mini; mini=99; loc=-1; for(z=0;z { if(p1[z].rbt>0&&p1[z].at<=i&&p1[z].rbt { mini=p1[z].rbt; loc=z; } } return loc; }
APAT
Pure round robin scheduling processes A, then B, then C, then starts at A again. (A, B, C might be tasks in an operating system context, or devices in a master/slave control network, or whatever.) That is, pure round robin scheduling doesn't acknowledge priorities, and does not allow out-of-order processing. Real-life systems typically use a mixture of algorithms that, together, allow for prioritized and out-of-order processing while, on the other hand, trying to prevent starvation of lower priority items.
Parenthesis will affect the order of execution priority of statements. Expressions within parenthesis assume highest priority.
yes
The uncontrollable urge to drop the A task and being crossing the C's off your to do list.
c program for shortest remaining time scheduling algo
Advantages: - Priority based premptive scheduling -multitasking -multithreading -better response time -valuable services like senaphore,mailbox,queues etc. Disadvantages: -expensive Advantages: - Priority based premptive scheduling -multitasking -multithreading -better response time -valuable services like senaphore,mailbox,queues etc. Disadvantages: -expensive
why we use disk scheduling in c ?
Don C. Adams has written: 'Block scheduling' -- subject(s): Block scheduling (Education)
Pure round robin scheduling processes A, then B, then C, then starts at A again. (A, B, C might be tasks in an operating system context, or devices in a master/slave control network, or whatever.) That is, pure round robin scheduling doesn't acknowledge priorities, and does not allow out-of-order processing. Real-life systems typically use a mixture of algorithms that, together, allow for prioritized and out-of-order processing while, on the other hand, trying to prevent starvation of lower priority items.
Pure round robin scheduling processes A, then B, then C, then starts at A again. (A, B, C might be tasks in an operating system context, or devices in a master/slave control network, or whatever.) That is, pure round robin scheduling doesn't acknowledge priorities, and does not allow out-of-order processing. Real-life systems typically use a mixture of algorithms that, together, allow for prioritized and out-of-order processing while, on the other hand, trying to prevent starvation of lower priority items.
Priority inversion is a situation where in lower priority tasks will run blocking higher priority tasks waiting for resource (mutex). For ex: consider 3 tasks. A, B and C, A being highest priority task and C is lowest. Look at sequence of context swaps A goes for I/O . unlocks mutex. C was ready to run. So C starts running. locks mutex B is ready to run. Swaps out C and takes mutex. A is ready to run. but A is blocked as mutex is locked by B. but B will never relinqishes the mutex as its higher priority than C. The solution to priority inversion is Priority inheritance.
J. C. Thorpe has written: 'A comparison of vehicle scheduling methods'
Steven C. Kleiner has written: 'Distribution of a generic mission planning and scheduling toolkit for astronomical spacecraft' -- subject(s): Scheduling, Mission planning, Spaceborne astronomy, Launch vehicles
Sometimes, it is. Some implementations compile C++ code into C code, and then compile the C code.
A) client schedules B) migration schedules C) enterprise schedules D) Synchronized scheduling with IBM Tivoli Workload Scheduler
Parenthesis will affect the order of execution priority of statements. Expressions within parenthesis assume highest priority.
yes