There are dozens of differences, but most are very minor. Essentially all the major events in the film actually happened - but were often condensed or simplified for the sake of telling the story. Ken Mattingly did get bumped because they thought he'd get measles (and he really never did). Marilyn Lovell really did have her ring slip off down the drain (though they did manage to retrieve it). They really did lose an engine during the launch. The explosion caused them to lose oxygen and power. The Aquarius became a life boat. Fred Haise got a urinary infection. The guys at mission control cobbled together an effective CO2 scrubber with plastic bags and tape. etc. etc. However: - One of the more famous minor changes is "Houston, we have a problem", which in reality was "Houston, we've had a problem". Other quotes in the film such as "I wonder where Gunter went?" was originally said by one of the Apollo 7 guys and "The constellation 'urion'" was coined by Wally Shirra. - There was no animosity towards Swigert, and he wasn't really considered a rookie as shown in the film as he'd written malfunction manuals for the command module. And if he couldn't dock The Odyssey and Aquarius, then Lovell or Haise could've done it. - Ken Mattingly became an amalgam of a number of different people in the second half of the film while testing the power up for the command module - otherwise there would've been too many other characters to keep track of. Also, he wasn't CAPCOM during re-entry. - According to Lovell the Grumman guy in the film (rep for the company who produced the lunar module) was given a bum rap, and wasn't as antagonistic as shown. - There were a couple of engine burns not shown in the film. - There were four rotating mission control shifts. They are represented on screen and in the credits with names like TELMU Gold, EECOM Gold etc., but the focus in the film is on Gene Krantz' White Team who were on duty when the explosion occurred. This only really scratches the surface of minor differences. For the full picture one needs to read Lost Moon by James Lovell and Jeffrey Kluger (re-titled Apollo 13 when the movie came out) and listen to Jim and Marilyn Lovell's commentary for the film. Marilyn is almost in tears during the scene where Jim (Tom Hanks) dreams about walking on the moon.
It was based on the real life mission of Apollo 13, which took place in April 1970.
Apollo
Apollo had the realm of nothing cause he isn't real
No, Its Real
It was very much real.
It was based on the real life mission of Apollo 13, which took place in April 1970.
All the photographs taken of Apollo 11 on the moon are very much real, thwere is nothing fake in it at all.
Very little of it was 'real' footage.
Apollo
Of course it is not real, it is just a movie. Speak to your parents or teacher about the difference between fact and fiction.
The movie was a fictionalized account of an actual historical event.It's incredibly fictionalized, however - and the movie isn't remotely similar to what happened in real life. The biggest difference being that in real life "the 300" - were slaughtered - none survived.It's best to think of Hollywood movies that are based on real events as a type of, "What if it had happened this way" story, and to not accept anything at face value.Documentaries are, in theory, supposed to be accurate depictions of real events. Even these however are often very skewed and misrepresented.A movie made for entertainment that is "based on a real event" can by-and-large be accepted as, "This event actually happened, and that's about all the accurate information we're going to use."
A Shakespearean tragedy is a play; it isn't real.
They are spider-like creatures that pretend to moon rocks. I think that they are real because we don't know what is out there.
Apollo had the realm of nothing cause he isn't real
No, Its Real
The symbol for Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance in the NYSE is: ARI.
It wasn't. Apollo 10 was a real Apollo mission, they were the "dress rehearsal" for the Apollo 11 flight that took place 2 months later.