Could you be more specific. Like when and where the buildings are.
Rural areas are generally known to have very few buildings or less expensive looking buildings. There is sparse population density and a lack of industries.
The urban is a city area. With the buildings and departments and a lot of cars, especially taxes. And cities can go on for many miles, like the NY City. A rural is the country area. Countries can have buildings, taxes and departments and such, but not all over. A rural can also go on for many miles. The urban has a big population. The rural can too, but not in every country area, like a rural in Alaska. Urban has cars, buses, streetcars, subway trains to get around.
Well, urban areas have a large number of buildings and people in a small area, and rural areas have few buildings and people in a large area. Rural areas have a population of less than 5,000, and urban areas have a population of more than 5,000.
The average age of marriage for a women who lives in a rural area in the Philippines is 17 years of age. In city areas, women typically marry by the age of 22.
They are similar in that they both have people, buildings, and business, but an urban community has more people and buildings than a rural community. An urban community will have more commercial business and more commercial traffic as well as regular traffic. A rural area will have more natural areas, more plants and animals.
Urban or metropolitan, as opposed to rural.
Annapolis is considered an urban area. It is the capital of Maryland and is a historic city known for its naval base, government buildings, and vibrant downtown area.
It is generally safer to live in a rural area during an earthquake because there are fewer tall buildings and infrastructure that could collapse or cause harm. Additionally, rural areas tend to have more open spaces, reducing the risk of being trapped by debris. Finally, population density is typically lower in rural areas, which may lead to less overall impact and potential for harm during an earthquake.
Rural areas are generally known to have very few buildings or less expensive looking buildings. There is sparse population density and a lack of industries.
No, rural towns typically do not have tall buildings. Rural areas are known for their low population density and focus on agriculture or natural surroundings, so tall buildings are more commonly found in urban environments with higher population concentrations.
Rural areas are generally known to have very few buildings or less expensive looking buildings. There is sparse population density and a lack of industries.
I live in a rural area and it depends on where you are in that area.