The general rule for resistances in parallel (to find out the equivalent resistance) is: 1/R = 1/R1 + 1/R2 + 1/R3 + ... The same rule can be used for impedances (just replace resistance by impedance). So, you just have to divide 1 by each of the impedances, add the results together, then take the reciprocal. Note that addition and subtraction with complex numbers is easier if the numbers are in rectangular coordinates, whereas multiplication and division is easier if they are in polar coordinates. Also note that most scientific calculators have the capacity to convert between polar and rectangular coordinates. Check your calculator manual for details.
That is a weird question, given that Cartesian has such a specialized meaning, which is, relating to the French mathematician Rene Descartes. If you are talking about the Cartesian coordinate system, which is the familiar graph based on an x and y axis, you could call it an x and y graph, I suppose. That is not exactly the same as Cartesian but it would apply to that particular context.
The equation in slope-intercept form of a line that is parallel to a given line can be written as y = mx + b, where m is the slope of the given line and b is the y-intercept. However, since the slope is not provided in the question, the equation cannot be determined.
As it stands, the question can have no answer because there can be infinitely many parallel lines.
As a mathematical question this would refer to a choice of normally one of two popular coordinate systems, the Cartesian and the polar.
It does not. So the question is misguided.
We're not sure what information the question is looking for.The Cartesian coordinate system is named for its inventor,the French mathematician Rene Descartes.
That is a weird question, given that Cartesian has such a specialized meaning, which is, relating to the French mathematician Rene Descartes. If you are talking about the Cartesian coordinate system, which is the familiar graph based on an x and y axis, you could call it an x and y graph, I suppose. That is not exactly the same as Cartesian but it would apply to that particular context.
I'm not sure of what you mean by "parallel of the word" in this question.
This question is too vague to give a proper answer. The system was devised by Rene Descartes.
No. The question is meaningless.
Meridians are not parallel. Apart from that, what is the question?
If the surface can be imagined, then it can be represented. Therefore, the answer to the question is that there is no such surface.
the word parallel exactly across from eachother. An equals sign is parallel : = i hope this answers this question xxx =D
The equation in slope-intercept form of a line that is parallel to a given line can be written as y = mx + b, where m is the slope of the given line and b is the y-intercept. However, since the slope is not provided in the question, the equation cannot be determined.
The question does not make sense. Parallel lines, by definition, do not intersect.
As it stands, the question can have no answer because there can be infinitely many parallel lines.
Yes, as represented in the question, it is.