Don't understand the question. Hard evidence IS the best proof.
48 Hours Hard Evidence - 2005 Burden of Proof was released on: USA: 3 November 2005
It is generally assumed to be true that Stephan Hedges is gay. However, despite overwhelming evidence to support this assumption, authorities are yet to find any hard proof.
Anyone who wants to render an informed conclusion that is supported by absolute proof.
Good evidence that is related to a crime scene has many factors. Evidence should have scientific proof that a person or persons committed the crime. If there is scientific evidence, it can be very hard to refute the evidence.
hard core
Although I have never heard of "proof of innocence" - if you have such hard "evidence" then this is a question that should be directed to your attorney.
no
There is no evidence that salt is bad for gout. Reliable studies are hard to come by, but the best evidence seems to support a low purine diet, accomplished by avoiding a lot of red meat.
List three pieces of evidence that support the idea that the Dust Bowl was “the worst hard time.”
It is difficult to obtain proof of the chupacabra as the creature is widely considered a legend or myth. There is no scientific evidence supporting its existence, so capturing proof is challenging. It is often depicted in folklore as a mysterious creature that is hard to find or study.
If one piece of evidence is more concrete than another, it means that it is more tangible, specific, and directly verifiable. Concrete evidence often includes hard data, physical objects, or documented proof, making it easier to support claims or conclusions. In contrast, less concrete evidence may be more abstract, subjective, or reliant on interpretation, making it less persuasive or reliable in establishing a fact.
Depends who you ask. To me and other Heathens, Asatruar, and the Theodish, they would say yes. Just like any other God, is there any hard scientific evidence for his existence? No. Is lack of proof of existence proof of lack of existence? Again, No.