0
What else can I help you with?
Which case determined that the Fourth Amendment applies to school searches?
The case that determined the Fourth Amendment applies to school searches is New Jersey v. T.L.O. (1985). In this landmark decision, the Supreme Court ruled that while students have a legitimate expectation of privacy, school officials can conduct searches based on "reasonable suspicion" rather than the stricter probable cause standard used in other contexts. The Court emphasized the need to balance students' rights with the school's responsibility to maintain a safe and orderly environment.
How can you determine the iso symbol for my vehicle if there is no VIN?
Why is there no VIN number. All vehicles have a VIN number. The VIN is located in several places on the vehicle unless it is an antique vehicle. In the case of specialty vehicles or antique vehicles, usually to get physical damage coverage you will have to have the vehicle appraised and the rates will be determined by the value of the vehicle.
Why aren't general searches permissible?
General searches are unconstitutional and never legal. This stems from Marron V. United States (1927). In this case the court required that all warrants will particularly describe the things to be seized; nothing is left to the discretion of the officer executing the warrant. This case makes it impossible for general searches to be legal.
Is case of a pronoun determined by how it is used in a sentence?
Yes, the case of a pronoun is determined by its function in a sentence. For example, 'he' is in the subjective case when it is the subject of a sentence, and in the objective case when it is the object of a verb or preposition.
Who is at fault is a moving vehicle hits a non moving vehicle that is legally parked on the street?
Of course it seems like the moving vehicle is. They should have left a note if they were an individual with morals and who would'nt like that to be done to them. ADDITIONAL INFO: Though each accident is handled on a case by case basis, generally the operator of the moving vehicle would be at fault, however instances where a vehicle is illegally parked or grossly impeding traffic may warrant further investigation. In such cases it would be possible to make a case for the illegally parked vehicle be at fault. In such a case of an illegally parked vehicle the owner of the vehicle, even if not deemed at fault, would more than likely at least receive a citation. If such action occurred, then it would be easier for the operator of the moving vehicle, even though they were determined to be at fault, to make a case that if the illegally parked vehicle were not illegally parked in the first place then the accident would have never happened.
Which pronoun changes its form least as its case changes?
The personal pronouns that do not change from the subjective case to the objective case are you and it.
Is it always your fault if you hit someone from behind?
In almost all cases if one vehicle hits a vehicle from behind the rear vehicle is at fault. There are some extreme instances in which that is not the case, but it is a case by case basis.
Was Coppolino v State restricted the practice of conducting warrantless searches at a homicide scene in the case?
Yes, Coppolino v. State restricted the practice of conducting warrantless searches at a homicide scene. The court ruled that the evidence obtained from a warrantless search was inadmissible, emphasizing the need for law enforcement to obtain a warrant unless exigent circumstances exist. This case underscored the importance of adhering to constitutional protections against unreasonable searches and seizures, establishing a precedent for how such searches should be conducted in similar situations.
What case determined that African American slaves were not citizens?
dred scott...a+
What limitations have judicial cases placed on the search of a motor vehicle incident to a lawful arrest?
Judicial cases have established that the search of a motor vehicle incident to a lawful arrest is limited to areas within the passenger compartment where an arrestee might access weapons or evidence. For instance, the Supreme Court case Arizona v. Gant (2009) clarified that officers may only search a vehicle if the arrestee is within reaching distance of the passenger compartment at the time of the search or if it is reasonable to believe that evidence related to the arrest is present in the vehicle. Additionally, searches of closed containers within the vehicle are only permissible under those same conditions. These limitations aim to balance law enforcement's needs with individuals' rights against unreasonable searches.
What property is determined by the density of the medium?
Density is the property in this case.
What supreme court case protects overnight guests in the home of another against warrentless searches?
Minnesota v. Carter
