The centre of a black hole is singularity.A singularity is NOT a (specific) place. It is a property of a function where the value of that function approaches infinity. For example, the function f: x ⟼ 1/x has a singularity at x = 0 because lim_{x → 0⁺} f(x) = +∞.
A singularity is the set of points where a metric is undefined. It is a geometric property of a manifold that is not limited to black holes, and is not necessarily a single point.
A singularity can be just a coordinate singularity that disappears if you choose a different coordinate system for the manifold. For example, the Schwarzschild metric that describes non-rotating electrically neutral black holes has a coordinate singularity at the event horizon in Schwarzschild coordinates, but not in Kruskal–Szekeres coordinates.
By contrast, every known black hole metric has a true (curvature) singularity with all coordinate systems in or near the center of a black hole.
That singularity does not need to be a point either. For example, in the Kerr and Kerr–Newman metrics that describe rotating black holes (with angular momentum J ≠ 0) the singularity is a ring (a set of adjacent points/events).
Also, it is important to understand that singularities with black holes are not (a set of) points in space, but in space*time*: they are a set of *events*.
A spacetime singularity does not have to be a spacetime *curvature* singularity. For example, the Schwarzschild metric, the spacetime metric of a spherical mass distribution with total mass M, zero angular momentum, and zero electric charge, has a singularity at the Schwarzschild radius r = rₛ := 2 G M/c²:
ds² = ±(1 − rₛ/r) c²dt² ∓ 1/(1 − rₛ/r) dr² ∓ r² (dθ² + sin²θ dφ²).
Because r = rₛ ⇒ 1/(1 − rₛ/r) = 1/0 ⇒ lim_{r → rₛ} ds² = ∓∞.
However, this is NOT a spacetime *curvature* singularity because it can be avoided by using a different coordinate system. For example, the metric is in Kruskal–Szekeres coordinates:
ds² = 32G³M³/r exp(−r/(2 G M)) (±dT² ∓ dX²) ∓ r² (dθ² + sin²θ dφ²),
where c = 1. Now,
r = rₛ = 2 G M/c² ⇒ ds² = 16G²M² exp(−1) (±dT² ∓ dX²) ∓ 4G²M² (dθ² + sin²θ dφ²) ≠ ±∞,
and the spacetime singularity at r = rₛ disappears.
There is still a spacetime *curvature* singularity at r = 0 because 32G³M³/0 is not defined in these coordinates, and there are no known coordinates that can avoid that.
Finally, even a spacetime *curvature* singularity does NOT have to be point-like. The curvature singularity of the Kerr and Kerr–Newman metrics, for a black hole with non-zero angular momentum, is *ring*-shaped.
A Singuary
The Milky Way contains a supergiant blackhole at its center.
You cannot see a Blackhole with the naked eye and they're hard to detect anyway. No one would see a Blackhole pull anything into its center.
Kansas is the orphan of states. It is neither West nor Midwest. It is a blackhole in the center of our country.
In the galaxy m87 at the center of the constellation Virgo, is a super massive blackhole of 3 billion solar masses and a diameter of 11 billion miles.And that is in the known universe.Another's view: There is a blackhole of 18 billion solar masses in the quasar OJ 287 and it is (approximately) 3.5 billion light years away.
a lot of empty space and a point singularity at the exact center containing all the mass compressed to infinite density.
there is two syllables in thw word blackhole
Not exactly. The singularity is in the center of the black hole. Somewhat like a peach pit is in the center of the peach but it isn't the peach but part of it.
no
There are many black holes in the universe, and they are generally in the very center of a galaxy. Our Galaxy, the Milky Way, has one big black hole in the centre of it.
no
There are many ways.Plot the existence of any blackhole prior to travelMonitor gravitational influences in flight.Observe blackhole characteristics.In reality, a blackhole is not that much of a problem in spaceflight. All the other detritus is!!