the connection is that they both increased with the population
the connection is that they both increased with the population
the connection is that they both increased with the population
the connection is that they both increased with the population
The geographical things that led to growth of cities would be because of water lakes/rivers, crops, farming, construction, and more agriculture!
The geographical things that led to growth of cities would be because of water lakes/rivers, crops, farming, construction, and more agriculture!
The geographical things that led to growth of cities would be because of water lakes/rivers, crops, farming, construction, and more agriculture!
They were port cities . . . they were where a lot of commercial activity took place.
Farming in Mesopotamia allowed for the development of settled communities, leading to the growth of cities and complex social structures. The surplus food produced from farming supported population growth and allowed for specialization of labor, leading to advancements in technology, trade, and governance.
it wasn't.
In Runnymede England, there was farming practices,the growth of cities, and trade, and a growing population created a vigorous society.
The surplus of food produced by agriculture allowed farming villages to support larger populations, leading to the growth of villages into cities. These cities often became centers of trade, population, and political power due to their capacity to sustain and attract diverse populations.
Early farming villages became cities due to factors such as population growth, increased agricultural productivity, specialization of labor, trade and commerce, and centralized political power. As these villages grew in size and complexity, they developed into cities to better manage resources, provide more efficient governance, and facilitate economic activities.