0
"danger for motorists" and "danger to motorists" are both correct but can indicate two slightly different things.
A danger to motorists would indicate a danger from an outside source such as an object in the road, bad weather or fog, damage to the road, another driver, etc.
A danger for motorists can mean the same but more often it would indicate a danger from the driver him or herself, such as over tiredness, alcohol or drug use, something wrong with their vehicle, etc.
If you use them interchangeably no one will mind, it's not that much of a difference.
What else can I help you with?
How do you spell motorists?
The correct spelling is "motorists" (driver of an automobile).
Is will be had correct grammar?
No, "will be had" is not a correct grammar. The correct grammar would be "will have."
See you after an hour and a few minutes is a correct grammar?
No, it is correct grammar, not a correct grammar.
Is those are they correct grammar?
The correct grammar is: "Are those correct?"
Is 'on a train' correct grammar?
"On a train" is correct grammar.
When did you sent is this the correct grammar?
The correct grammar for this sentence is: "When did you send it?"
Does the sentence you do do that have correct grammar?
no_____If the sentence is You do do that (meaning You are in the habit of doing that) the grammar is perfectly correct and the sentence 'does have correct grammar'.
Is this a correct grammar i hate you the way you hate me?
No, the correct grammar would be "I hate you the way you hate me."
Is july has just been started a correct grammar?
"July has just been started" is not correct grammar, instead the correct grammar is "July has just started."
Is the phrase did he kissed you yet correct grammar?
its has he kissed you yet that's the correct grammar-Erendiraa
Is my mother an I correct grammar?
The correct way to phrase this question is: "Is my mother and I correct grammar?"
What is the correct grammar for thank you for the information shared with me and Sam?
The grammar is correct as it is.
