0
any more. 'no more' would make it double negative, and it would mean 'you do want more'
Wiki User
∙ 15y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What did you had for lunch or what did you have for lunch is the correct phrase?
What did you have for lunch. It makes much more sense than what did you had for lunch.
Is it correct to say within today?
It does not sound natural, and the more widely used phrase is "within the day".
Which phrase is correct - thought of the day or thought for the day?
Both are correct but their meanings are not exactly the same. Thought of the day sounds as if it is used after the day. Thought for the day makes more sense before the day or at its beginning.
Is it correct to say who is this for instead of for whom is this for?
Technically the phrase "Whom is this for" is the grammatically correct version of this statement, but in modernized English there are a fair amount of people who don't know the difference between "who," and "whom." So in a casual situation, or when talking informally, the phrase "Who is this for" is acceptable--enough, but not only do you sound more intelligent when you use the word "whom" correctly, but also it's the correct way of using the language. Simply, it is not technically correct, but in a casual situation, it is acceptable.
Which is correct thinking of you or thinking about you?
Either is correct. "Thinking of you" is the more common phrase you would see on a greeting card to let someone know that he or she was in your thoughts. It is a bit more poetic and possibly romantic. There is nothing wrong, however, with saying something like "I've been thinking about you and your pet iguana."
Is ''I can't wait no more correct?
The correct phrase is "I can't wait any longer." Using "no more" in this context is not grammatically correct.
Is how don't I grammatically correct?
The phrase "how don't I" is not grammatically correct. A more correct way to phrase it would be "why don't I."
Is the phrase 'cattiva ragazza' or 'ragazza cattiva' more correct in Italian?
The more correct phrase is ragazza cattiva, not cattiva ragazza, since it is more common and correct to put the adjective after the noun in Italian.
What is correct When more than one is or When more than one are?
'when more than one are' is the correct phrase.
Do they make games for ps2 anymore?
they dont either because they are making more systems or there stupid. im trying to get somebody to answer my thing,why dont they make ps2 games anymore.
Is the 'strap of the bag' a correct phrase?
'the bag's strap' is more usual.
Why dont they make more mr bean episodes?
because hes to old to do it anymore
Are you are sorry to have missed your call and you are sorry for missing your call both correct?
Yes. First phrase is more correct, but second is more sincere.
Is 'in a train' correct grammar?
Although "in a train" may seem correct, the more commonly used phrase is "on a train".
Is the phrase 'subject above refers' correct?
No, the phrase "subject above refers" is not correct. A more appropriate phrasing would be "the subject mentioned above" or "the subject referred to above".
Which is correct - 'more little time' or 'few more time'?
Neither phrase is correct. The phrase "more little time" should be "a little more time," while the phrase "few more time" should be "a few more times."
Is the grammar correct please return to me after signature?
The grammar is not correct. A more correct way to phrase it would be: "Please return the document to me after signing."
