Explain why 62.605 x106 is not the correct scientific notation. What is the correct way of expressing this scientific notation.
Your answer:
62.605 x 10 = 626.05. The scientific notation of 626.05 is: 6.260500e+2
It is: 3.0*10^9 msIt is: 3.0^9 ms in scientific notation
No. There has to an exponent on the 10, anywhere from 0 to infinity. A correct example of scientific notation would be 6.022 x 1023, which is Avogadro's number, or 3.0 x 108m/s, which is the speed of light in a vacuum. The correct format for scientific notation is one nonzero digit in front of the decimal point times ten raised to some power.
There is no true opposite of scientific notation, but the closest answer is Standard Notation.
You do not simply calculate scientific notation for nothing. You need a number for which you calculate the scientific notation.
It is simply 1.72*10^2 in scientific notation
The correct scientific notation for 0.00050210 is: 5.021 × 10-4
The correct scientific notation for 0.00566 is: 5.66 × 10-3
The correct scientific notation for 0.000681 is: 6.81 × 10-4
The correct scientific notation representation for 0.000214 is: 2.14 x 10-4
5.37 x 10-4The correct scientific notation of 0.000537 is: 5.37e-4
500.0 in Scientific Notation = 5 x 102
It is: 1.55*10^9 in scientific notation
411,000 in Scientific Notation = 4.11 x 105
0.00670m in Scientific Notation = 6.7 x 10-3m
1,002,000,000 in Scientific Notation = 1.002 x 109
It is not. "Scientific notation" uses a base of 10. The correct notation would be 1.251 x 10^8
It is 5.66*10^-3 in scientific notation