I will know it when I see it.
The question is mis-leading and assumes an unproveable fact. Obscenity (as defined by the courts) receives no protection from the judicial system. Certain cases charging 'obscenity' have been brought to court and been rejected on the 'Free Speech' or 'Free Press' grounds but many have been prosecuted as well.
Yes, Miller v. California (1973) dealt with defining obscenity. The opinion in the case was written by Chief Justice Warren E. Burger.
Morbid Obscenity was created in 2006.
Twin Obscenity was created in 1991.
The majority opinion uses lower courts' decisions on the same case as evidence.
majority opinion
Miller v California was a Landmark United States Supreme Court case that changes the precedence involving what constitutes unprotected obscenity for First Amendment purposes. The decision reiterated that obscenity was not protected by the First Amendment and established the a test called the Miller Test for determining what material was deemed obscene.
Vicinity of Obscenity was created in 2006.
Hijknk
Hijknk
He screamed nothing but obscenity at the police officers and got arrested as a result.Obscenity is not allowed in the Answers community.It is not very nice to spout obscenity at people.
according to potter stewart, obscenity is not defined because you would knw it, once you see it.